Two more periods of lackidaisical play and UNH was in a big hole - again. Coach Umile juggled the 3rd and 4th lines: Goumas-Silengo-Henrion and Speelman-Block-Pavelski. He must have seen something in practice to lead to this change. But, frankly, it didn't work. They seemed out of sync on most shifts and, overall, the team generated many fewer shots on goal by the end of the 2nd period - only 18. Midway through the third period, Henrion was back with Block and Speelman and Pavelski joined Goumas and Silengo. They clicked better after that.
DiGi's play merited the first star but Thompson was a worthy recipient as well. There were still too many turnovers in UNH's end leading to decent chances by Merrimack. The Moses-Borisenok-Sorkin line was probably the most consistent throughout the game. Borisenok's ability to steal the puck and control it in traffic is really impressive. Sorkin's speed continues to be a good fit with Moses and Borisenok but I noticed that he was bumped off the puck a number of times along the boards in the Merrimack zone. This is one aspect of play that Greg Burke has the advantage. He seems to be stronger and more stable with the puck than Sorkin. What Burke lacks in foot-speed, he makes up for in strength. It will be interesting to see how Burke is reintegrated into the team when he recovers from mono.
Was it me or was Henrion splitting time with 2 different lines all night
Moses has nasty wheels but no hands.
Moses so much reminds much of that pitcher that can chuck the ball 95+mph but is just off the strike zone! Moses could ease up just a tad for his hands to catch up as he's approaching the net, he'd propapbly have 4-5more goals easily and be one of the most if not the most offensively feared guys in the league. He's got a lot of goalies beat cold, but he either loses the handle, or shoots off the net. Hope he can find a speed that works..100mph is not always the most effective speed when you can't control when things are going to end up. No doubt about that. Anyway, I think we all enjoy seeing Steve play- he's aggressive, plays clean & goes right to the net and although he might miss a few he doesn't let up just because he's missed, no doubt about that either.
Dartmouth was named Team of the Week by College Hockey News.Looks like the annual battle with Dartmouth in January will truly be a battle.
They had a interview with stamkos who mentioned that earlier in his career that he didn't have good hands or a good shot. In addition to his practice and games, he would shoot 500-600 pucks off synthetic material each day. I have also come across some of his stick handling drills on youtube and they are pretty nuts too. In addition to insane genetics comes freakish dedication and work ethic ; something I don't think many fanbases can understand.
again, not knocking on Moses, but just found it interesting that other players have these problems and put in serious dedication to solve them. To be clear, I respect anyone who can lace em up for a D1 squad. The term 'no hands' is relative, and I would kill to be a crappy player on the club.
also to be clear, I think UNH is playing a very complete team game this year. This is much more important than a few extra goals potted by an individual. I hope they can keep this up
I thought unh_hockey and i'zonprizes' assessment of Stevie Moses had merit. Have you seen him enough this year to comment?Stamkos was being very, very modest. Had amazing hands and shot at every step of his career.
I thought unh_hockey and i'zonprizes' assessment of Stevie Moses had merit. Have you seen him enough this year to comment?
"One thing we're really pleased with from a forward perspective is the depth at forward," UNH associate head coach Scott Borek said Wednesday. "This is my ninth year here, and we've had some very good teams, but I think this is the deepest we've been up front. I think we can score on all four lines." (from fosters.com)
"One of the things you find out early in the year is who can be successful with who," Borek said. "It's unusual to have the lines set as quickly as we did and then to have them set themselves long term. I think (changing the lines) was as much about February and March as it was about December. You just don't want guys getting into a groove, because that groove can go both ways, too early in the season."
Interesting quote from Borek talking about the depth at forward while the team has zero fourth line goals this year.
My take on a fourth line has always been that goals are sort of a bonus. If you can roll a fourth line out there, especially at this still relatively early part of the season, and have them play at a level that makes them NOT a liability - as in, not running around with a -15 for the line - then you're in pretty good shape.