Patman
Rodent of Unusual Size
It would have to be private schools, I would assume BU and BC.
BU has usually been friendly.., my guess is BC and UMass
It would have to be private schools, I would assume BU and BC.
Kick {rov and Merrihack out of Hockey Rast for Hahvahd and UConn!
I'm thinking this has nothing to do with being friendly with UConn or not. I'm guessing that it is BC and BU and they were afraid certain pieces of their information might leak to the other.
BU has usually been friendly.., my guess is BC and UMass
The report saysBU has usually been friendly.., my guess is BC and UMass
I'm honored that you think that the UMass hockey program fits that description.Two institutions whose hockey programs are recognizable in both Hockey East and in collegiate hockey, did not participate in this survey. As a result, data from Hockey East schools is weighted towards more modest revenues and expenses.
If this happens, I hope the NCAA finds some way to avoid awarding the Ivies an AQ.
Not saying that those teams as a group are necessarily inferior, it's just that I hate AQs, and see no reason for allowing them to trump the PW. We certainly don't need another one dangling out there to further muddy the water.
Salaries. Income. Stuff like that. Giant egos getting bent out of shape and demanding more.Pieces of their information? Explain.
How in the world are they getting a $13 average ticket price for the Atlantic?
And an average of 51 suites in ECAC arenas??? With an average of 58 seats?? Among other strange numbers. The AHA sales numbers definitely don't add up. Hopefully, for UConn's sake the critical numbers regarding UConn and HEA are more accurate.
I would assume all the public schools participated. That information has to be released anyways b/c they are government institutions, and it is all FOIA-able, so there's no benefit to not saying anything.
Bear in mind the numbers they cited were based on the teams they surveyed.
1) The consultants estimated an upgrade to 3500 was feasible on the current site (assuming no major changes or new land acquisitions), to a cost of $10.8 million. As I suspected, the best way to expand would be to build up the roof space a la Matthews. An encouraging number if accurate, but it doesn't fit with the HEA desire for at least a 4000 seat arena (the number is cited as a minimum, but it's also stated as not a deal breaker, simply requiring extra approval from the commissioner and/or the conference membership; if HEA is as interested in UConn as it seems, that could be a formality, but that remains to be seen). 3500 is not so far off from 4000, however.
Of course not. Ridiculous on the face of it. There might be 51 total but even that is probably a stretch. Suspect the definition of "suite" might be an issue or they are counting their tournament venue suites. Who knows? Probably of little consequence. All they needed was a white paper and they got it. Sounds like the Governor is on board. Let's go!Is there even one ECAC arena with 51 suites?
Of course not. Ridiculous on the face of it. There might be 51 total but even that is probably a stretch. Suspect the definition of "suite" might be an issue or they are counting their tournament venue suites. Who knows? Probably of little consequence. All they needed was a white paper and they got it. Sounds like the Governor is on board. Let's go!
Among the schools that would be able to say no are BC, BU, NU, PC, and MC. BC is an obvious no. PC would likely have been in the survey since they wouldn't want to harm relations with their conference partner. That leaves BU, NU, and MC. BU has nothing to loose from UCONN joining. Among st the remaining two its a toss up on who would not want UCONN in.