What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UCHC Playoffs

smbenny

Elmira College Fan
Tuesday 2/25: Nazareth at Elmira 7pm.

I would expect a close game. Elmira plays better on the road so I am a bit nervous. My prediction is EC 3 Naz 2.
 
Re: UCHC Playoffs

Tuesday: Battle of the birds haha, I think it'll be a close, hard-fought game. EC scrapes by 5-4.

As far as Neumann v. Stevenson: Neumann hangs tough but Stevenson pulls away, Stevenson wins 6-2.

Which could then set up Utica v. Elmira (could be a tough matchup!) and Wilkes v. Stevenson.
 
Which could then set up Utica v. Elmira (could be a tough matchup!) and Wilkes v. Stevenson.

Could be? EC beat UC in Utica and the game in Elmira was tied most of the game. EC held UC to only 3 shots on goal in the first period. Fear the Eagle 😎
 
Re: UCHC Playoffs

All the games should be dog-fights, with every team aside from Utica playing for its NCAA life. Very tough tournament to predict.
 
Re: UCHC Playoffs

Halfway through the 2nd period at Elmira its 2-0 Nazareth

Edit: After 2 its 3-0 Nazareth

Edit....oh my. Less than 4 minutes into the 3rd period, its now 3-2
 
Last edited:
Re: UCHC Playoffs

Nazareth with the road upset of Elmira!

It'll be:

Nazareth or Neumann @ Utica

Stevenson or Nazareth @ Wilkes
 
Re: UCHC Playoffs

Final from Elmira: 5-2 Nazareth.

Well, there you go...

I don't see an AL possibly coming from the UCHC now, unless Wilkes wins-out and gets some gigantic, perfect-storm, PWR help.

Of course, any remaining team could "earn" an AQ!

I wonder how Neumann is looking tonight? (Not wondering enough to look it up.)
 
Last edited:
Well, there you go...

I don't see an AL possibly coming from the UCHC now, unless Wilkes wins-out and gets some gigantic, perfect-storm, PWR help.

Of course, any remaining team could "earn" an AQ!

I wonder how Neumann is looking tonight? (Not wondering enough to look it up! :p)

Check back tomorrow......
 
Re: UCHC Playoffs

Well, there you go...

I don't see an AL possibly coming from the UCHC now, unless Wilkes wins-out and gets some gigantic, perfect-storm, PWR help.

Of course, any remaining team could "earn" an AQ!

I wonder how Neumann is looking tonight? (Not wondering enough to look it up.)

You don't think Utica can get an at-large bid?
 
Re: UCHC Playoffs

You don't think Utica can get an at-large bid?

Of course they would, even if they lose-out until the NCAA's begin. And I'll predicted a #2 seed.

Sorry, I parsed my comment inaccurately, but Utica looks like a lock to me in any case.

The idiotic AQ's might-well stir the mix, but UC is in no matter what at this point. And almost certainly with a 1st-round bye.

All the RS calculi should be over by now, but people sure love those absurd conference tournament side-shows. I'll never understand that.
 
Last edited:
Re: UCHC Playoffs

Of course they would, even if they lose-out until the NCAA's begin. And I'll predicted a #2 seed.

Sorry, I parsed my comment inaccurately, but Utica looks like a lock to me in any case.

The idiotic AQ's might-well stir the mix, but UC is in no matter what at this point. And almost certainly with a 1st-round bye.

All the RS calculi should be over by now, but people sure love those absurd conference tournament side-shows. I'll never understand that.

Why play the games anyway? Why not just crown a championship after a said number of games? Cause the is what makes it a sport, you work all season to peak at the right time
 
Re: UCHC Playoffs

Great game last night, guess Naz is picking it up and winning when it matters. Barring a Neumann upset, a Naz v. UC series is going to be interesting with Naz heating up now. Also, a series rematch from last year's semi-finals. Now the waiting to see how tonight's game will play out.

And to touch on the NCAA stuff quick, the 2012-13 team got a berth/first round bye and didn't win the conference tournament that year. They got in mainly, I believe, because of how the regular season played out and staying in the top 10 for rankings for the better part of the season. *knock on wood* if somehow Utica doesn't manage to get the AQ from the conference tournament, I agree they'll definitely be in the NCAA's. They've been holding strong at #2 in the PWR for a few weeks now and have shown they're worthy of a spot.
 
Last edited:
Well, there you go...

I don't see an AL possibly coming from the UCHC now, unless Wilkes wins-out and gets some gigantic, perfect-storm, PWR help.

If Wilkes wins out they will need zero PWR help as they will have earned their conference AQ.

If Utica loses in the UCHC tournament, they likely do not need a PWR “perfect storm” to get in either.
 
Re: UCHC Playoffs

Why play the games anyway? Why not just crown a championship after a said number of games? Cause the is what makes it a sport, you work all season to peak at the right time

Fish evidently thinks there is no need for a national tournament, after that's just a meaningless series of games, too.
 
Re: UCHC Playoffs

Fish evidently thinks there is no need for a national tournament, after that's just a meaningless series of games, too.

Not really, considering the lack of intercourse between East and West. And the NC is a fun thing to watch, anyway, if the teams involved have a logical argument to be represented.

I just would prefer that the field was chosen on a more objective basis. (For example, top-12 PW, irrespective of conference-affiliation.)

Don't you -as a statistician- agree on that point on a logical basis?

(Don't pander to the LCD on that one, please. You know you know.)
 
Back
Top