What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The Power of the SCOTUS Part VI - Roberts rules disorder

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The Power of the SCOTUS Part VI - Roberts rules disorder

If you had any shimmer of hope that the Constitution still existed, it doesn't anymore. Legislation from the bench.
 
Re: The Power of the SCOTUS Part VI - Roberts rules disorder

FlagDUDE08 said:
If you had any shimmer of hope that the Constitution still existed, it doesn't anymore. Legislation from the bench.
Click to expand...

Because the Second Amendment, unlike all other rights, is absolute. :rolleyes:
 
Re: The Power of the SCOTUS Part VI - Roberts rules disorder

Kepler said:
Because the Second Amendment, unlike all other rights, is absolute. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

What part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand? I thought ivy leaguers were supposed to be intelligent...
 
Re: The Power of the SCOTUS Part VI - Roberts rules disorder

Despite misgivings about the Imperial Presidency, this seems like it was decided sanely. You can't have Congress running around trying to exercise what is clearly an executive power.
 
Kepler said:
Despite misgivings about the Imperial Presidency, this seems like it was decided sanely. You can't have Congress running around trying to exercise what is clearly an executive power.
Click to expand...

You're about 24 hours late for the discussion on that one, chief... ;)
 
Re: The Power of the SCOTUS Part VI - Roberts rules disorder

unofan said:
You're about 24 hours late for the discussion on that one, chief... ;)
Click to expand...

We didn't really talk about the details, though. Just that it was weird that Fra Clarence is all over the place.
 
Re: The Power of the SCOTUS Part VI - Roberts rules disorder

FlagDUDE08 said:
If you had any shimmer of hope that the Constitution still existed, it doesn't anymore. Legislation from the bench.
Click to expand...
Hey, with the Court tilting more liberal by the day, nothing should be very surprising.
 
Re: The Power of the SCOTUS Part VI - Roberts rules disorder

Bob Gray said:
Hey, with the Court tilting more liberal by the day, nothing should be very surprising.
Click to expand...

You do know the current Court is farther right than any time since the early 1930's, right?
 
Re: The Power of the SCOTUS Part VI - Roberts rules disorder

I like that ruling in that they were very, very selective and left what is probably a much more important and substantial decision at the door. Nicely done.

On the overall case itself, it just comes off like a dik measuring contest between a bunch of whiny adult children.
 
Re: The Power of the SCOTUS Part VI - Roberts rules disorder

dxmnkd316 said:
On the overall case itself, it just comes off like a dik measuring contest between a bunch of whiny adult children.
Click to expand...

'Twas ever thus. I would say that description seemingly covers at least half of all lawsuits on the docket at any given time.
 
Re: The Power of the SCOTUS Part VI - Roberts rules disorder

The President tonight threw down the gauntlet at the Supreme Court re PPACA. His quote was, I believe, "Don't you dare overturn this law."

Bad move IMO. You don't waive the red flag at the bull.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top