So... you're proposing a 1-16 straight bracket?
Where is the reward for the top 4 seeds performing so well during the regular season?
Bash me all you want for being a Cuse / Big East supporter, there's still the fact that more games = more opportunities for injuries.Playing the 13-16 seeds?
Or is that not a good enough reward for the exalted top 4 seeds of the grand Big East conference?
The Big East tournament structure shows that 16 teams is WAY too many to have a tournament.
I think having the top four seeds play on the opening day of the tournament against the bottom four seeds would make more sense.
and then the winners of those games get a bye to the quarterfinals while the 5-12 playoff.
Just my thought so that the top seeds can get playing again early and then get a day off while everyone else has to play four days straight.
Ohio State winning easily. Come UVA. You think if Duke loses that Cuse will get that #1 seed?
It shows something, anyway, like double byes are stupid or the NC$$ has rendered major conference tourneys pointless.
There's one team regarded as being "in" at the moment that I don't quite understand. That would be Georgia Tech. I just don't think any team with a below .500 conference record has done enough to be a tournament team. They beat a terrible UNC team to improve to 8-9 in ACC games. Unless they beat Maryland today, I don't see it.