Go schedule AHA teams and ECAC teams or Hockey East teams. .
Go East sounds good to me. They need to fill the schedule.
Go schedule AHA teams and ECAC teams or Hockey East teams. .
Go East sounds good to me. They need to fill the schedule.
You will see some series with Eastern teams, although it will be fairly limited. Flights aren't cheap for either team.
Hockey East teams like Notre Dame would be great since the Big and NCHC teams don't want to play the Irish in NC.
Indeed, Tech and Northern are now 3/4, and I'll have to look at the conference tiebreakers to see how that comes down. As I've noted before, I'll do that either in Week 22 or 23, probably 22 because I said that I would. Thanks, oldish husky.
Edit: post is updated: http://uahhockey.com/blog/2014/02/02/krach-schedule-2/
GFM
As far as how scheduling goes, first, I am totally in favor of a bye after a trip north. Second, I don't care so much about the unbalanced schedule as long as the race is interesting, and I have to say this is the most interesting race in a long time. Third, it would be good if we could collectively figure out how to reduce travel costs.in.
The late addition of UAH after the schedule was already done or nearly done.
You will see some series with Eastern teams, although it will be fairly limited. Flights aren't cheap for either team.
Geoff,
you might want to review your prognosis. You have Tech in there twice.
Who has the tie breaker between Alaska and Lssu. I have them tied for 8th at the end.
The tiebreakers are: a) head-to-head points, but only if you’ve played four contests against each other, b) higher number of conference wins, c) comparison of winning percentages against all teams above them, team-by-team down through the table.
I had a couple of typos in the predictions table that I've fixed. The spreadsheet is definitely right.
As for tiebreakers, that's covered here: http://uahhockey.com/blog/2014/01/14/krach-schedule-1/
For my comparisons, I've sorted descending order on points first and then wins second. I'll handle tiebreakers closer in. It probably won't be for next week, because I've got exams next week and probably shouldn't blow three or four hours on best-finish/worst-finish and tiebreakers when I should be playing industrial engineering graduate student.
GFM
Maybe I'm an idiot (OK, I am an idiot), but why do you have Ferris with a zero loss season when they've already got 3 losses? Seems to me that it would be improbable for them to finish 14 points ahead of MSU when they are only 2 points ahead with 8/10 games to go.
You're looking at the Week 17 prediction, which was made when FSU was still undefeated and had a killer KRACH rating. At that point, it was reasonable to expect that they'd run undefeated. I've kept those projections week-by-week down below the current projection for historical perspective in how the rating has changed over time: how Ferris faltered but never dropped below Mankato (who just had too many 0-point games); how Tech has made a steady rise up the prediction table; how Alaska has been on the bubble the entire time; how Lake State has never been bad enough for the Truth Squatters to get their wish (an in-season firing of Jim Roque).
The easiest way to read the Summary tab is with the current table at left and the predictions to the right of that.
[Edit]: I realized after posting that you were looking at the URL from Week 17, which had Ferris running the table. The table has been edited since then, with a published update: http://uahhockey.com/blog/2014/02/02/krach-schedule-2/. I had linked to the old article because it had the tiebreaker information in it.
GFM
UAA and uaf are playing Wisconsin and Maine in the Kendall hockey classic, and playing Air Force and penn state in the Brice Alaska goal rush