Re: The New WCHA IV (2013-14): Unlocked and Cocked
It seems to me we had a pretty good sampling of fans willingness to travel to the tournament based on their team’s performance and distance to the location. Obviously, sample size alert; and this is based on what I saw, so it’s most likely flawed. I’m just giving my best guesstimate based on the most attendance I saw for a team at any point during the weekend. I certainly encourage others who were there to share their perception.
Teams in the immediate area:
Participating: Ferris – 3,500
Not Participating: N/A
Teams within half day’s drive:
Participating: Bowling Green – 500
Not Participating: Lake State – 20? (I seriously don’t recall see any LSSU fans, but I’m sure there were some)
Teams within a full day’s drive:
Participating: Minnesota St – 300
Not Participating: NMU, MTU, Bemidji, UAH – 100
Need a plane:
Participating: Alaska Anchorage – 50
Not Participating: Fairbanks - A couple?
I think the most important piece missing is how many fans would come from a team in the immediate area, that wasn’t participating. If the number isn’t at least a couple thousand than the neutral site idea may be in real trouble. Knowing many Ferris fans I believe that had Ferris lost on Friday, turnout for Saturday would have been embarrassing.
In terms of options for future tournaments I think you have:
- Neutral sites – I think this option is far too dependent on one or two schools making it to the FF and playing in the championship game to provide any consistency in terms of attendance and revenue for the conference.
- Highest seed hosts – Best attendance, best atmosphere, most cost efficient (not paying rental to neutral sites), and increases likelihood that the conference is represented by its best team.
- Destination site – I think there are two options for this:
- Always host the tournament in Marquette, it is within a day’s drive of virtually the entire conference (sorry Alaska), it’s a conference city, even if NMU doesn’t make it, I’d be surprised if you didn’t still have 500 NMU fans to increase attendance. BGSU and MSM showed that teams participating would drive up to 8-10 hours and still bring 500+ fans. In a 4,000 seat arena this seems like a pretty good option, you could even record a few sellouts.
- Embrace the fact we have the only warm weather school in NCAA hockey and always have the thing at UAH. Attendance would almost certainly suffer; however with this option I think you switch to a 10 teams single-elimination tournament so every fan in the conference can plan on making their annual warm weather hockey voyage. The Frozen Four in Tampa was a great success, fans like warm weather, leverage this unique opportunity.
I believe the current option we are using will prove to be the least desirable over the long term, too much variability and relatively low upside. We probably had one of the better-case scenarios this year in GR, and while good, it wasn’t overwhelming. I also believe the WCHA seriously need to revisit the cost of tickets, nothing justifies $50 for championship game tickets. In my opinion they should have lowered the cost of lower bowl tickets to about $20 or $30 and only sold lower bowl tickets; instead you spread fans out in the upper deck and make the building look even emptier.