What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

It is not a Super Target. So says Target's website. So once again I am right and you are wrong. Who would've guessed?

Once again? Pretty sure this is the first time. I could have sworn I remembered back about 10 years ago when they remodeled that store it was to turn it into a Super Target, but perhaps I was misinformed. Guess that just goes to show how irrelevant the difference is between Target and Super Target.
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

After doing a little further research to satisfy my curiosity, I came across this. If the information given here is true, then that would make the Fargo store a Super Target as they do have groceries there. Again, I personally would not rank that as something that would make or break my decision to want to live somewhere. Just saying that people shouldn't be so smug about things they think they're right about when they're actually wrong.
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

After doing a little further research to satisfy my curiosity, I came across this. If the information given here is true, then that would make the Fargo store a Super Target as they do have groceries there. Again, I personally would not rank that as something that would make or break my decision to want to live somewhere. Just saying that people shouldn't be so smug about things they think they're right about when they're actually wrong.

Wait wait wait. You think a Yahoo Answers page on the difference between a Target and Super Target trumps what the actual Target website says? This explains so much. Since I'm still right, because you know Target website, I can only infer that I am allowed to continue being smug. Thanks!
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

Wait wait wait. You think a Yahoo Answers page on the difference between a Target and Super Target trumps what the actual Target website says? This explains so much. Since I'm still right, because you know Target website, I can only infer that I am allowed to continue being smug. Thanks!

Honestly, I don't even know what to believe. Is it possible that Target is behind on updating their own website to reflect former Target stores that were renovated and upgraded to Super Targets? I don't know, maybe. Since you come off as the know-it-all type, please enlighten me... what is the difference between Target and Super Target? I honestly don't even know because, as I have already hinted at, it doesn't make that much difference to me. But if it isn't adding the grocery section that makes a Target become a Super Target, then please tell me what you think it is. And, by the way, I'm still waiting for you to tell me about the previous time that you were right and I was wrong. I know I'm going to be waiting for a long time on that one because it never happened.
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

Geez, you don't remember anything! I was right about the NCHC being awesome and too good for all those crappy WCHA teams.
 
Honestly, I don't even know what to believe. Is it possible that Target is behind on updating their own website to reflect former Target stores that were renovated and upgraded to Super Targets? I don't know, maybe. Since you come off as the know-it-all type, please enlighten me... what is the difference between Target and Super Target? I honestly don't even know because, as I have already hinted at, it doesn't make that much difference to me. But if it isn't adding the grocery section that makes a Target become a Super Target, then please tell me what you think it is. And, by the way, I'm still waiting for you to tell me about the previous time that you were right and I was wrong. I know I'm going to be waiting for a long time on that one because it never happened.

If they're 10 years behind on updating that information that would be pretty sad on their part.
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

Resistance is futile. Even if they don't get the Notre Dame Sports Network (which is abbreviated NBC for some odd reason), one of them will still be guaranteed to be NCAA champs. We'll be lucky if they even let us compete in Division 1 once they kick out Colorado College and add the almighty Fighting Irish. All hail the super duper league.
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

Geez, you don't remember anything! I was right about the NCHC being awesome and too good for all those crappy WCHA teams.

Uhhh, actually... no you weren't. The current #1 ranked team in the nation is from the WCHA. That makes you not right on that one. Try again.
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

If they're 10 years behind on updating that information that would be pretty sad on their part.


I agree, but at the same time I'm still waiting for the all-knowing one to explain the difference between Target and Super Target. If it isn't the grocery section, then what is it?
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

I can still remember as if it happened yesterday when the Big Ten hockey conference officially came into existence. Fans of certain teams that I will not name here went on and on crying about how the Big Ten schools were killing the WCHA and CCHA, only to see those teams go on to form the NCHC. The Big Ten hockey conference didn't kill the WCHA or the CCHA, but the NCHC did in fact kill the CCHA.
Uh... the fans are at the mercy of the school's administration. At some point they have to accept the changes and move on, unless they are Tech or NMU fans, in which case they will just harbor the resentment until they die of a stroke at age 52. It isn't like the NCHC programs decided to form the league solely based on the wishes of the fans.

Also, the CCHA was a garbage league. Look no further than the results of their teams this year and last year now that they have to play non-CCHA teams. Not only that, but the crummy league that was the CCHA would have been down to 7 teams when Notre Dame left. Can you imagine a conference tournament with Miami, WMU, NMU, LSSU, Alaska, BGSU and Ferris? That league would have tried to join up with the WCHA anyway after they realized that every program was losing money.

I have no respect for any of the schools in the NCHC because of the mere fact that they did what they did as a knee jerk reaction to the Big Ten. I'm not going to argue the success of any of those teams on the ice, as some of them are quite good. I just happen to feel that it took a certain lack of ethics to abandon the WCHA and CCHA the way those teams did. They did the very same thing that they accused the Big Ten schools of doing (acting like they're too good for the rest of the schools in their respective conferences). The only difference is the Big Ten schools didn't have a choice, they had an all sports affiliation with the conference with an exemption for hockey only due to the fact that fewer than six conference schools had a D1 hockey program. Once Penn State got on board it was an automatic move on the part of the conference to sanction hockey, the individual schools didn't have a say.

The Big Ten didn't have a choice is complete bull. Rules get changed all the time. If they thought it was a bad idea to start a hockey conference, they wouldn't have done it. Only B1G bobos use this crappy excuse.

For the record, the Big Ten hockey conference is the best thing to ever happen to college hockey for the purpose of getting more widespread mainstream exposure. Casual sports fans who are familiar with the Big Ten name but have never heard of the WCHA or CCHA are now more likely to discover college hockey than they were before.

I love the "for the record" statement that has absolutely no basis in fact. Just a biased opinion of an idiot who likes a B1G team. Do you actually believe this? Casual sports fans don't watch college hockey. If they did, the ratings for the NCAA tournament would be a lot better. If they don't want to watch the best teams in the country play, why would they want to watch the awful hockey played by the Big Ten teams?

The NCHC schools had a choice, they could have remained loyal to the WCHA and CCHA but jumped ship with the arrogant attitudes that they were too good for the rest of the schools in those conferences. Well, that just goes to show the NCHC schools have no class.

They were too good for the rest of the schools. The rest of the schools were punching bags for the past 20 years. At least now on the Island of Misfit Toys they have a chance at winning a conference title and/or making an NCAA tournament appearance once in a while. Why would the schools that actually have successful programs that make money stay in a league where they are outnumbered and have less decision making power than the Anchorages and Lake Superior State's of the world? You also forget to mention the fact that NMU and Tech have both switched between leagues before. So apparently they also have no class, whatever that means.

GO BIG TEN!!!

I think you need to root harder, because the Big Ten is probably going to have as many teams make the tourney this year as Atlantic Hockey.
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

The Big Ten didn't have a choice is complete bull. Rules get changed all the time. If they thought it was a bad idea to start a hockey conference, they wouldn't have done it. Only B1G bobos use this crappy excuse.
I heard this awhile back that Minnesota did not want to start a B1G conference and that Penn St. forced it.




Why would the schools that actually have successful programs that make money stay in a league where they are outnumbered and have less decision making power than the Anchorages and Lake Superior State's of the world?
Read this as well. Once Wisconsin and Minnesota left. The other power schools were left to the mercy of the lower budget schools.
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

Uhhh, actually... no you weren't. The current #1 ranked team in the nation is from the WCHA. That makes you not right on that one. Try again.

His point was that the NCHC conference is way better than the WCHA conference. And the numbers prove it. Look at the NCHC's out of conference record vs. the WCHA's. Look at those rankings: yes, every poll and ranking system has Mankato, Michigan Tech and Bowling Green in the top 10. Then where's the rest of the WCHA? Bemidji, Alaska and Ferris State are the next best, around 30th or so. Unanimously behind the top 7 of the NCHC.

7/8ths of the NCHC would be ahead of all but 3 teams in the WCHA. And 5 of the 8 are in the top 10, which mean if you're in the top 10 teams in the country you still might not get home ice in the NCHC. But if you're a top ten team in the WCHA? You've already wrapped up a top 3 spot. That's right; Mankato, Michigan Tech and Bowling Green can't be caught by any of the bottom 7 with 3 to 4 weeks left in the season. Not only is there not a single NCHC team that has mathematically clinched more than 7th place, but there's not a team that it couldn't realistically happen to if they had a few injuries, the wheels completely fell off or if they just stopped playing good hockey and didn't catch any breaks.

Mankato, Bowling Green and Tech have had good seasons so far, but 3 out of 10 teams being really good and a huge drop off after that is a far cry from 5 of 8 being really good and two more teams right on their heels. NCHC > WCHA. simple math
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

Mankato, Bowling Green and Tech have had good seasons so far, but 3 out of 10 teams being really good and a huge drop off after that is a far cry from 5 of 8 being really good and two more teams right on their heels. NCHC > WCHA. simple math

You think Bowling Green and Tech are really good? I know you are trying to be nice, but I will bet that neither of them wins an NCAA tournament game.
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

You think Bowling Green and Tech are really good? I know you are trying to be nice, but I will bet that neither of them wins an NCAA tournament game.

I'm saying that both teams at this point in the season deserve credit for the season they've put together, and if I'm gonna use stats to give the NCHC credit, those same stats speak well of both of those teams.

And if one and done is credentials for calling out a team, I can think of at least one of the top NCHC teams that I'd peg for getting 60 minutes of NCAA tournament time.
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

You think Bowling Green and Tech are really good? I know you are trying to be nice, but I will bet that neither of them wins an NCAA tournament game.

I'd take that bet even without knowing the matchups, considering that both BG and Tech are 1-1 against the vaunted NaCHo this season.
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

You think Bowling Green and Tech are really good? I know you are trying to be nice, but I will bet that neither of them wins an NCAA tournament game.

Half the NCHC teams that make the tournament probably won't win a single game either.
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

His point was that the NCHC conference is way better than the WCHA conference. And the numbers prove it. Look at the NCHC's out of conference record vs. the WCHA's. Look at those rankings: yes, every poll and ranking system has Mankato, Michigan Tech and Bowling Green in the top 10. Then where's the rest of the WCHA? Bemidji, Alaska and Ferris State are the next best, around 30th or so. Unanimously behind the top 7 of the NCHC.

7/8ths of the NCHC would be ahead of all but 3 teams in the WCHA. And 5 of the 8 are in the top 10, which mean if you're in the top 10 teams in the country you still might not get home ice in the NCHC. But if you're a top ten team in the WCHA? You've already wrapped up a top 3 spot. That's right; Mankato, Michigan Tech and Bowling Green can't be caught by any of the bottom 7 with 3 to 4 weeks left in the season. Not only is there not a single NCHC team that has mathematically clinched more than 7th place, but there's not a team that it couldn't realistically happen to if they had a few injuries, the wheels completely fell off or if they just stopped playing good hockey and didn't catch any breaks.

Mankato, Bowling Green and Tech have had good seasons so far, but 3 out of 10 teams being really good and a huge drop off after that is a far cry from 5 of 8 being really good and two more teams right on their heels. NCHC > WCHA. simple math

At this point in time it is a true statement that the NCHC is a better conference than the WCHA, but when you place the word "way" in front of the word "better" it becomes a false statement. The NCHC is currently deeper, I'll give you that, but the top half of the NCHC is merely equal to the top half of the WCHA. They're good, I won't say they aren't, but they aren't good enough to justify their arrogance and the way they bailed on the remaining WCHA/CCHA teams (especially after all the melodramatic whining they did after the Big Ten teams left).
 
Re: The NCHC Year Two: Haters Please Form A Queue to the Right

At this point in time it is a true statement that the NCHC is a better conference than the WCHA, but when you place the word "way" in front of the word "better" it becomes a false statement. The NCHC is currently deeper, I'll give you that, but the top half of the NCHC is merely equal to the top half of the WCHA. They're good, I won't say they aren't, but they aren't good enough to justify their arrogance and the way they bailed on the remaining WCHA/CCHA teams (especially after all the melodramatic whining they did after the Big Ten teams left).

You never read back did you?
 
Back
Top