What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The "I Can't Believe There's No Abortion Thread" Part Deux: Electric Boogaloo

Status
Not open for further replies.
ScoobyDoo said:
https://twitter.com/ChrisAlbertoLaw/status/1435385146954371074
Click to expand...

Her ridiculous rule is apparently similar to one in Ohio that was recently overturned.

Also, it requires that these medications be prescribed "only after an in-person examination". Well, How soon after? If it's the patient's OB/GYN and they saw them within the year timeframe for normally allowed prescribing, does that count?

Either way, it's an obvious defacto ban on these as most doctor visits shifted to telemedicine for several months last year (and for most of us who have brains, continues now).
 
LynahFan said:
I assume this one is making the rounds, but saw a snippet that made a lot of sense to me. Paraphrasing: if you can force a woman to use her body to save the life of a fetus, then why isn't organ donation mandatory?
Click to expand...

Our former anti abortion zealots on here never could answer my question to them about requiring fathers to be organ donors to their children if needed. They always sidestepped that one.
 
That's because opposition to abortion has never had the slightest thing to do with life. It is about putting female sexuality under the control of men.

Conservatives will never accept that women are free and equal human beings. Their magic book teaches the opposite. Women are sexual slave labor: first for a man to barter, then for a man to satisfy himself, then for the tribe to ensure reproduction to start the next cycle of slavery. She has no agency and no values apart from her role in a family controlled by men.

Conservatism is inherently misogynist.
 
Kepler said:
That's because opposition to abortion has never had the slightest thing to do about life. It is about putting female sexuality under the control of men.

Conservatives will never accept that women are free and equal human beings. Their magic book teaches the opposite. Women are sexual slave labor: first for a man barter, then for a man to satisfy himself, then for the tribe to ensure reproduction to start the next cycle of slavery. She has no agency and no values apart from her role in a family controlled by men.
Click to expand...
Kavanaugh gets plastered and perhaps rapes someone. “Boys shouldn’t be held accountable rest of their lives for a mistake.”

girl gets preggo at 17 or 18? “Deal with it for rest of your life!!!”
 
Kepler said:
That's because opposition to abortion has never had the slightest thing to do with life. It is about putting female sexuality under the control of men.

Conservatives will never accept that women are free and equal human beings. Their magic book teaches the opposite. Women are sexual slave labor: first for a man barter, then for a man to satisfy himself, then for the tribe to ensure reproduction to start the next cycle of slavery. She has no agency and no values apart from her role in a family controlled by men.

Conservatism is inherently misogynist.
Click to expand...

It's no fun if you actually answer the question honestly. :-P
 
2aei83ltxjm71.jpg
 
The more I think about the TX law, the more incredulous I am. I mean, can you imagine a state having the audacity to pass a law that any private citizen could sue another for $10k for posting a conservative meme on social media, and then having the audacity to sit back and say that technically the state isn’t suppressing free speech? Can you imagine? I’m looking at you, CA and NY. Please get this done.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top