What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The GQP Thread: I'm even sick of that fuck's number and, anyway, he's gone (for now)

Status
Not open for further replies.
St. Clown said:
Huffington was taken for a ride there. No way somebody with a nazi tank division pin is using the term”cis-gender”.
Click to expand...

Those "people" actually use that terminology in mockery now. They say it the same way Pepe types used to say "I identify as an Apache attack helicopter." To cause pain.
 
Maggie gets bent over.

Former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann was vehemently critical of Haberman, posting, "Oh good, another fact, vital to the safety and continuation of the nation, that @maggieNYT withheld from the public for many months if not a year-and-a-half so she could put it in her f*****g book."

Similarly, Dean Baker, a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, tweeted, "If the NYT was a serious paper, Haberman would be fired on the spot for this. She did not do her job: full stop. This would be like a cop watching someone shoot a person right in front of them, and then just walking away and doing nothing."

Author John Pavlovitz wrote, "Maggie Haberman is another in a long line of people who were willing to let democracy die on the altar of a book deal."

@DenaePFA posted, "She's not really a reporter if she's not reporting on it at the time. She's an access novelist." And @Concerned4410 tweeted, "Yes we know this. He said when asked by reporters would he peacefully transfer power as all other presidents have . . .his reply. . We will see. . 'If I lose it will only be because of FRAUD'. . . You see. . He admitted his crime before it happened."

@HogsRUs, responding to Olbermann and Baker's tweets, wrote, "Spot On. @maggieNYT is employed as a reporter by the NYT. The information that she gathers on topics the newspaper pays her to cover belongs to the NYT. If not, then the NYT may as well just let her sit in her office at the paper and work on her books all day."

@Jkornack made a scathing analogy and tweeted, "To sustain the analogy, the cop would witness the murder, walk away, and then — rather than doing nothing — would sell the story to a publisher and would be invited by cable news outlets to promote the publication to maximize personal profit at the expense of society."
Click to expand...

Hopefully she will be taught in journalism schools like Walter Winchell as a loathsome example to avoid.
 
Last edited:
Not likely...she will be held up as an example of how to turn a dying medium into personal wealth. That the NYTimes let her be on the Trump beat with her and her family's history of working with the Trumps and Kushners is proof they have no interest in reporting anything of value.

Nothing beat though when she got skewered for ripping Michelle Wolf for her comments about Sarah Huckabee Sanders because they were "sexist". Not only was she made to look a fool but she got outted that Sanders was basically her source along with Kushner.
 
Handyman said:
Not likely...she will be held up as an example of how to turn a dying medium into personal wealth. That the NYTimes let her be on the Trump beat with her and her family's history of working with the Trumps and Kushners is proof they have no interest in reporting anything of value.

Nothing beat though when she got skewered for ripping Michelle Wolf for her comments about Sarah Huckabee Sanders because they were "sexist". Not only was she made to look a fool but she got outted that Sanders was basically her source along with Kushner.
Click to expand...

The NYT has about as much relevance to the future of journalism as The Daily Worker.

Over the last twenty years it has plummeted from being considered the gold standard of news reporting to a barely concealed parlor publication for Ivy neoliberals rationalizing their decision to go to law school.
 
Last edited:
At least her lawyers are smart enough to hedge so when more lies come to light they won't be in trouble.
 
Kepler said:
So they have at least one subscriber for another 50 years. B-tch will bury us all. She's not even winded, and I think her grandmother made it to 110.
Click to expand...

I go back and forth on living to 100. I'd love to. I've always wanted to. But I also don't want to have to move to Nome just to be able to walk outside without frying an egg on the sidewalk.
 
dxmnkd316 said:
I go back and forth on living to 100. I'd love to. I've always wanted to. But I also don't want to have to move to Nome just to be able to walk outside without frying an egg on the sidewalk.
Click to expand...

It’s cute you think nome would be livable in 50 years.
 
I have faith in scientists, I don’t think we are going to stop sea level rise enough. A certain amount is already baked in
 
Alex jones is finding out today! He’s no longer allowed to run infowars due to lack of transparency
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top