The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`

[LTsatch]

Re: The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`

Just ran across this site, not sure if the pairwise posters had ever seen it, cool setup, although it is much easier to predict the pro game playoffs.

http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL.html

 

[Patman]

Re: The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`

Just ran across this site, not sure if the pairwise posters had ever seen it, cool setup, although it is much easier to predict the pro game playoffs.

http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL.html

We've seen it in past years. He's tried to do college but all he does is reconcile to his own ratings and doesn't use league play tiebreakers.

The pro game is easier because the formats are singular... one system of tie-breakers, etc.

 

[Priceless]

Re: The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`

Remember this from January 8th? It looks like the committee did just that:

1a) No Hockey East teams in the Midwest Regional
1b) No ECAC teams in the West Regional

2a) UML and BC both in the Northeast Regional
2b) Union and Quinnipiac both in the East Regional.

That observation makes Happy sad.