Patman
Rodent of Unusual Size
Re: The 112th Congress - The first Orange-American to be elected Speaker
You mean all 41 voted against? You mean all 41... they couldn't get a single bit of bi-partisanship. For a group that came into 1/09 about how post-partisan they were going to be, its hard to imagine they couldn't siphon off one person. Of course "post-partisan" really meant "everybody agrees with us now, shut up"... but what do I know... I openly disagree with the smart set.
You'd think maybe it'd be infinitely easier to get a bill passed then than now? Maybe Democrats should have bent a little? Nah... that'd be unheard of... its mean to think that its good Dems should relent... its just immoral.
That being said, when they start to talk about budgets and the rest, they need to start quoting two figures... 1) the figure in current dollars... 2) the figure in dollars relating to how much borrowing those dollars will cost when we get around to paying off that debt. Maybe some people would see there's a problem when $10K for a Cowboy Potery Slam in Outer Nevada gets dual quoted at $25K. Or Obama's vacation to Williamsburg gets dual quoted at $100K/$245K... oh, vacation? Sure, it might only be a short trip away... but shouldn't the president of the people be awaiting a budget bill and a signature? Suppose he'll rush back... or will he be blowing it on a $500/$1240 round of golf? Maybe he knows something we don't... like maybe he wants a shutdown? Of course, those who will be affected by the shutdown probably won't be enjoying much... of course they wouldn't go to Williamsburg anyhow... don't want to run into those dirty furriners... isn't that right, Kepler? BTW, bigotry isn't an enlightening principle just because you hold liberal principles.
Lest we forget, we would have had a budget 4 months ago had the GOP not filibustered it in the Senate.
http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/12/16/sen-gop-leader-kills-omnibus-bill
You mean all 41 voted against? You mean all 41... they couldn't get a single bit of bi-partisanship. For a group that came into 1/09 about how post-partisan they were going to be, its hard to imagine they couldn't siphon off one person. Of course "post-partisan" really meant "everybody agrees with us now, shut up"... but what do I know... I openly disagree with the smart set.
You'd think maybe it'd be infinitely easier to get a bill passed then than now? Maybe Democrats should have bent a little? Nah... that'd be unheard of... its mean to think that its good Dems should relent... its just immoral.
That being said, when they start to talk about budgets and the rest, they need to start quoting two figures... 1) the figure in current dollars... 2) the figure in dollars relating to how much borrowing those dollars will cost when we get around to paying off that debt. Maybe some people would see there's a problem when $10K for a Cowboy Potery Slam in Outer Nevada gets dual quoted at $25K. Or Obama's vacation to Williamsburg gets dual quoted at $100K/$245K... oh, vacation? Sure, it might only be a short trip away... but shouldn't the president of the people be awaiting a budget bill and a signature? Suppose he'll rush back... or will he be blowing it on a $500/$1240 round of golf? Maybe he knows something we don't... like maybe he wants a shutdown? Of course, those who will be affected by the shutdown probably won't be enjoying much... of course they wouldn't go to Williamsburg anyhow... don't want to run into those dirty furriners... isn't that right, Kepler? BTW, bigotry isn't an enlightening principle just because you hold liberal principles.