Re: Stupid, dumb, moronic...take your pick
The extra week is great. It gives the teams (some of whom played Sunday night) the time to prepare. It gives fans the opportunity to arrange travel. It gives us another week to talk hockey. You could use the opportunity to
savory the finale of the hockey season, but you can't summon the restraint of a five year old.
Not that I have a strong opinion or anything.
I understand why on the surface those arguments are viable. BUT - they would then imply that NCAA hoops is hamstringing the final 4 teams, the fans who need to travel and event marketing by playing the following week - as they do. Which of course isn't true. They don't want to kill the momentum of the tourney and wnat to stay in tourney mode. (Is its a cliche to say players who rest during an allstar break have to knock off the rust the first few games back? We're talking 4-5 days in that situation. Well, the media is always the first to ask that question so why doesn't it apply here? Superbowl aside..different sport all together)
Back to the reasons echoed in whatever..5 threads is it? No offense "Victor Mature" but look closer and you'll see that those reasons are watercooler Bullsh**.
Travel - In 1985, we set up travel & lodging to Detroit on a few days notice for the finals from Troy, NY. These days, go to Orbitz/Priceline and book a cheap flight & discounted hotel (Detroit remember) in 10 minutes. If your school is near Detroit, they will be setting up buses (like mine did back in the stoneage) or people will simply road trip. As for time off...I think anyone would notify their respective obligations at the start of the tourney that weekend may be goner if your team makes it.
Rest - I bet everyone in that tourney (despite what they say on camera..you know, don't make the NCAA look bad) would take the 4 days rest and want to go right back and finish it just like hoops. I never hear basketball complain about the turn around time. Because there is nothing to complain about (and yes..more than just people affiliated with the schools go to that tourney).
I understand that the bottom line is that of course - like it or not - hockey is still the little brother in the panthenon of American College major sports (unfortunately including women's hoops) and that's the base of the argument for the NCAA to showcase it on it's own the following weekend. However, I still would bet that the extra week of coverage -at best- marginally draws in the non-hockey fan at the expense of the tourney losing steam. I'm just saying that ESPN could package (and market hockey on the coattails of hoops) something like an NCAA Championship weekend. 2 Games Friday (hockey), 2 games Sat. (mens hoops), 3 games Sunday (Men's finals and women's semis). Yes, I know, Sunday is the problem as baseball opens on Sunday night as well.
As my friend Redfreak says before he edits his post; I can
savory the end of the season just fine in one week as I'm sure the players and coaches would rather do and everone will have time to get there and have there nap before the first game is played.
Not that I have a verbose opinion or anything.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5189/c51896754cb68cae40a1e4aa6cce06ce95147f43" alt="Wink ;) ;)"