What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Strands in the Tapestry: the Business, Economics, and Tax Policy Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Strands in the Tapestry: the Business, Economics, and Tax Policy Thread

I'll have to quote you on this the next time one of you disagrees with one of my posts.

another non sequiter, eh? no one complains about hurt feelings when you post, they complain about the absence of logical thought. Big difference.
 
another non sequiter, eh? no one complains about hurt feelings when you post, they complain about the absence of logical thought. Big difference.

Says the man who believed the "Unskewed polls" website, right up until about 11:20 PM EST on Election Day. :D
 
Re: Strands in the Tapestry: the Business, Economics, and Tax Policy Thread

Says the man who [notices that Republicans now have 30 governors and control the state legislatures in over half the states and have a solid majority in the House]

The most humorous part of your bombast is how those inconvenient things like real life events consistently belie your predictions. If I were a vindictive sort, I'd keep a file just to rub your face in it, but I can't be bothered.

I do keep track of my own predictions for my personal use, it helps keep me honest and humble as I actually do value data over unsupported pure opinion.
 
The most humorous part of your bombast is how those inconvenient things like real life events consistently belie your predictions. If I were a vindictive sort, I'd keep a file just to rub your face in it, but I can't be bothered.

I do keep track of my own predictions for my personal use, it helps keep me honest and humble as I actually do value data over unsupported pure opinion.

Feel free to prove to me how conservative Republicanism is on the rise Fishy. I always get a good laugh from your bleetings of how Roberts actually struck down the ACA law or how the GOP is calling the shots even though 1) taxes for the rich went up and 2) military spending got slashed all with Republican votes (that sound you hear is Reagan rolling over in his grave). Funny though how a party that got outvoted in 5 out of the last 6 elections is in its heyday. One has to wonder what bad times look like for them...:confused:

Moving on from Fishy's nonsense, its funny how conservatives always run on a fiscal platform, then once they get into office its knuckledragger social policies with a Talibanesque flair. Here's the latest from North Carolina, where the knucks apparently want to declare an official state religion...

http://theweek.com/article/index/242244/could-north-carolina-actually-declare-a-state-religion


This is your party people. You gotta own it. :cool:
 
Re: Strands in the Tapestry: the Business, Economics, and Tax Policy Thread

ALBANY — Over the past six years, state senators are more likely to have been arrested than to have faced defeat at the polls.

Since 2007, 11 senators have been charged with crimes compared with just nine lawmakers who lost a re-election bid

That's more than one per year! and just in NY state alone.

Why does this matter so much? It's not just moral outrage, it is also fundamental economics as well.

The plight of the world's poor can be summed up in three truly ugly C-words: corruption, collusion and cronyism. All three may be kissing cousins but each in any language makes a mockery of both capitalism and justice.

Some 20 years ago economists began asking why so many countries, especially in Africa, never get better, even amid periods of global growth. An enormous body of economic literature now exists confirming that corruption keeps the poor down. A survey of this work for the International Monetary Fund concluded that countries get stuck in a "vicious circle of widespread corruption and low economic growth."

Corruption suppresses growth because citizens in time recognize that honest work produces a lower return than spending one's energies gaming the system. And, they've also found, the vicious circle worsens when real productivity falls alongside an inexorably expanding public sector.

Global poverty persists because corruption kills capitalism. [emphases added]

Political corruption consigns our poor to lives of crushing poverty with no escape. It seems to me that anyone who claims to be a progressive yet is not upset with government corruption doesn't really care about others at all, merely about how good they feel about themselves: for them, their so-called progressivism is just a facade.

Our Founders knew that most people were venal and selfish. that is why they set up a system of limited government with checks and balances: each bloc would compete with every other bloc for personal advantage, thereby assuring that no one bloc had dominant control over the entire government.

An unofun pointed out, people are prone to corruption in any walk of life. However, the consequences of government corruption are more severe than private corruption, which means that we have to be more vigilant to rein it in.
 
Last edited:
Re: Strands in the Tapestry: the Business, Economics, and Tax Policy Thread

A New York state Assemblyman and four others were charged Thursday morning with bribery and conspiracy, according to the U.S. attorney's office for the Southern District of New York.

This news is in addition to the six who were charged earlier this week.

So, unofun, are you going to tell us again that government officials who accept bribes are not greedy? :rolleyes:
 
Re: Strands in the Tapestry: the Business, Economics, and Tax Policy Thread

If only George W Bush could have run for a 3rd term...

I see you saying the same thing about Obama if they can't repeal the 22nd amendment... or they just choose to ignore it for some reason...
 
I see you saying the same thing about Obama if they can't repeal the 22nd amendment... or they just choose to ignore it for some reason...

No worries Flaggy, Hillary will be more than happy to take care of that for us! Lest you think Rand Paul is unbeatable...;)

Moving on, some dolts still believe in the "free lunch" theory, that tax cuts pay for themselves. Empirical analysis doesn't agree however:

http://www.nationalmemo.com/no-new-tax-cuts-will-not-pay-for-themselves/
 
This news is in addition to the six who were charged earlier this week.

So, unofun, are you going to tell us again that government officials who accept bribes are not greedy? :rolleyes:

Are you going to keep denying that CEO's who ruin the economy and get paid millions to do so are just as bad?

I'm not apologizing for the 1% of workers that are crooks. I'm defending the 99% who aren't from your constant scapegoating.

I suppose I could start linking to every news story I see like you and old pio do, but then I'd have to turn into one of those people who forwards chain e-mails and yell at people to get off my lawn.
 
Last edited:
I see you saying the same thing about Obama if they can't repeal the 22nd amendment... or they just choose to ignore it for some reason...

Everytime you say something reasonable, you spew tinfoil-tastic ideas like this that reminds me you're insane.

My offer still stands, by the way, to let you put your money (or anything else worthy of a bet) where your mouth is. I'll wager that we don't see martial law at any point over these next 3.5 years. I'll even give you odds.
 
Re: Strands in the Tapestry: the Business, Economics, and Tax Policy Thread

I'm not apologizing for the 1% of workers that are crooks. I'm defending the 99% who aren't.

Where do you come up with those percentages? They seem wildly distorted.

We're talking about elected officials, right? and their staffs? not some typist in the steno pool?
 
Where do you come up with those percentages? They seem wildly distorted.

We're talking about elected officials, right? and their staffs? not some typist in the steno pool?

You said gov't employees and referred to transportation pensions, so no.

Though even if we were, politicians are sufficiently numerous that they shouldn't be in jail anymore than the average member of the population barring a self-selecting characteristic. But then you'd have to admit that same characteristic would likely apply to ceo's as a group, so that doesn't get you really far.
 
I suppose I could start linking to every news story I see like you and old pio do, but then I'd have to turn into one of those people who forwards chain e-mails and yell at people to get off my lawn.

You'd also have no job and no significant other! ;)
 
Re: Strands in the Tapestry: the Business, Economics, and Tax Policy Thread

Moving on, some dolts still believe in the "free lunch" theory, that tax cuts pay for themselves. Empirical analysis doesn't agree however:

http://www.nationalmemo.com/no-new-tax-cuts-will-not-pay-for-themselves/

Someone missed the memo regarding the Senate proclamation that the amount of money a person declares as income cannot be assumed to remain stagnant. Not to mention, the Senate proclamation was proven to be true from 2003 to 2007.
 
Re: Strands in the Tapestry: the Business, Economics, and Tax Policy Thread

Sometimes it seems like the public sector is obsessed more with growing its own size than it is with delivering value to the public. The education establishment is a prime example.


Today the school systems in 20 states employ more non-teachers than teachers. The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice reports that between 1950 and 2009, the number of teachers rose 252 percent, while the number of bureaucrats — including sensitivity enforcers and other non-teachers — increased 702 percent.

And Americans wonder why their generous K-12 financing has done so little to improve reading, math and science scores.

Yowch! Non-teacher positions growing nearly 3 times faster than teachers, AND these "positions" typically pay ridiculous administrator salaries too. Yet what value is being delivered by all these extra administrators??
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top