looks like 3 players on this years roster transferred in.
Karissa Kirkup, who played at Maine last year, is not shown on the roster on the UMD website but played in (or at least dressed for) 9 games for the Bulldogs. She's listed on the roster on collegehockeystats.net.Only one for this year. Michela Cava transferred from UConn this season. Meghan Huertas transferred last season after she was released by Vermont. Not sure where you're getting the third from
Karissa Kirkup -- came in from Maine this year.
See the edits to my previous post. But thanks for the follow-up.Kirkup left the team without warning before the Cornell series. I'm talking packed up her room without her roommates knowing and just left town.
Kirkup left the team without warning before the Cornell series. I'm talking packed up her room without her roommates knowing and just left town.
Left Maine and has already left this team too????????? Must be the coaches.
Wow, more turmoil than I was aware of. It's hard to build a cohesive unit with so many players coming and going, which makes their mostly winning ways this season pretty remarkable.
When the coach has been in place that long, the culture is on her as much as the athletes. They are her recruits. If she's going to take credit when the team wins -- and she has always been very willing to do so -- then she should own the failures more than she has. Over the years, it's always been blamed on admissions or some players on the fourth line or Jeff Vizenor, but she's recruited some players that weren't very good and then played others out of position. It would be refreshing if she'd say, "I've got to admit, that wasn't my besting coaching job." About the closest she has ever come do doing so that I've heard was when she admitted at the WCHA Tourney last year that she tried some experiments in the series in Minneapolis that just plain didn't work, and her team was lousy in that series. There's been more swings and misses in recent years, and I think that's partly because the coaches she's matched against these days are on average better than they were 15 years ago.However, I do also think that the players that have left were bringing the team down. The past couple seasons there has been a culture of players not willing to put in the hard work and effort necessary to be a D1 athlete. Some, not all, were definitely more interested in the college party scene than the college hockey scene.
It's hard to compete with the schools (UM and UW) because of who those coaches are. Regional, or blue chips as you put it, will pick blue chip coaches. The rodents seek and land foreign players as well, so like coach miller says, support the student-athletes and their decisions. Elite players want to play for elite coaches and maybe that's where UMD is losing players? Idk, just my thoughts.
add in that she made political comments that offend half the fan base, ironically it would have played well in Minneapolis or Madison, but in Duluth, especially the surrounding area, not so much
ics (and apparently was asked to coach in 2014 and turned it down - bet she regrets that decision now) and is one of only three coaches with over 350 wins (thanks Wikipedia). That seems pretty "elite" to me.
When the coach has been in place that long, the culture is on her as much as the athletes.
When the coach has been in place that long, the culture is on her as much as the athletes. They are her recruits. If she's going to take credit when the team wins -- and she has always been very willing to do so -- then she should own the failures more than she has. Over the years, it's always been blamed on admissions or some players on the fourth line or Jeff Vizenor, but she's recruited some players that weren't very good and then played others out of position. It would be refreshing if she'd say, "I've got to admit, that wasn't my besting coaching job." About the closest she has ever come do doing so that I've heard was when she admitted at the WCHA Tourney last year that she tried some experiments in the series in Minneapolis that just plain didn't work, and her team was lousy in that series. There's been more swings and misses in recent years, and I think that's partly because the coaches she's matched against these days are on average better than they were 15 years ago.
I hope I'm sensing the sarcasm here. This would seem to be more indicative of the character of the player and not the coaching staffs
that's partly because the coaches she's matched against these days are on average better than they were 15 years ago.
What were the comments she made?
Miller squawks about the pay between the men & women programs and the lack of women in college hockey coaching ranks but it is easy to forget that originally all the coaches in the WCHA were women, the difference is that all of them went after kids directly from high school while she filled her team with players 1, 2 & 3 years out of HS with additional hockey experience. In short the other coaches were taking HS students and making college athletes out of them while Miller was taking hockey players and attempting to make students of them. The result? WI eventually lost patience and hired Johnson who made all of the women coaches obsolete. Eventually every other school followed in WI footsteps.
So who is the real friend, and who is the villain, of female college hockey coaches?
If she drew as much interest to her team's games as she does in getting canned, she'd have her contract extension.
see above
there is a parallel to this, wrestling coach J Robinson also raised eyebrows with some of his comments, the difference? Apparently Robinson could read the writing on the wall and shut up, apparently Miller couldn't and didn't
So her statements were about the difference in pay between the men's and women's programs? That happens almost everywhere. Our basketball coach complained bitterly about the salary, budgetary and recruiting difference between the men's and women's programs for two years. When it became apparent the university wasn't going to step up, she went to Michigan State and is now head coach at Duke. While she was here the women's basketball team became a revenue sport, alongside hockey and baseball. Since Coach P left the program has gone steadily downhill to the point that we have one of the worst teams in the country and women's hoops is back to being a taker rather than a contributor to the athletic budget.
Replacing an elite coach will almost certainly be difficult and you don't have to look far to see teams that went from the penthouse to the outhouse rather quickly after a coach departs. Considering the cloud that now surrounds the program at UMD, I think it's going to be nigh impossible to find a quality replacement. More than likely, you'll get a seat-filler for 3-4 years before they get fired and the real search begins.
So her statements were about the difference in pay between the men's and women's programs? That happens almost everywhere. Our basketball coach complained bitterly about the salary, budgetary and recruiting difference between the men's and women's programs for two years. When it became apparent the university wasn't going to step up, she went to Michigan State and is now head coach at Duke. While she was here the women's basketball team became a revenue sport, alongside hockey and baseball. Since Coach P left the program has gone steadily downhill to the point that we have one of the worst teams in the country and women's hoops is back to being a taker rather than a contributor to the athletic budget.
Replacing an elite coach will almost certainly be difficult and you don't have to look far to see teams that went from the penthouse to the outhouse rather quickly after a coach departs. Considering the cloud that now surrounds the program at UMD, I think it's going to be nigh impossible to find a quality replacement. More than likely, you'll get a seat-filler for 3-4 years before they get fired and the real search begins.