What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread

Recruit Update

Forwards
Milan: 27 points (14G 13A) 5PIM in 25 games for Penticton (BCHL)
Dowd: 12 points (3G 9A) 4PIM +6 in 10 games for Indiana (USHL) (leads team in points)
Oliver: 2 points (0G 2A) 19PIM +1 in 12 games for Fargo (USHL)
Ravndalen: 2 points (0G, 2A) -5 26PIM in 14 games for Waterloo (USHL)
Benik: 15 points (11G 4A) 2PIM in 9 games for Minnesota (MNJHL) (tied for team lead in goals)
Holka 22 points (13G 9A) 36PIM in 28 games for Penticton (BCHL)

Defense
Jensen: 5 points (0G, 5A) 4PIM +3 in 12 games for Green Bay (USHL)
Gravel: 0 points 2PIM -1 in 11 games for Sioux City (USHL)
Daly 13 points (5G 8A) 45PIM in 28 games for Langley (BCHL)
Burrell 17 points (1G 16A) 14PIM +3 in 25 games for Wenatchee (NAHL)


HS
Benik: St. Francis
Prochno: Minnetonka
Prochno: 12 points (3G 9A) 12PIM in 25 games for Team Southwest (Elite League)
 
Re: SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread

scsutommyboy said:
If you want them I still got them......
Click to expand...

Sorry tb, but I'm still young enough where those of us who aren't still going to SCSU can get in with IDs of our friends up there, so free beats face value. :D

BobMotzkoFan said:
scsutommyboy:

I really did not want to post, but after your display of lack of knowledge of the game i felt compelled to. This coming from someone who is close to the team, so i know what im talking about.
Click to expand...

Appreciate the insight, but GOOD GOD, I hope you're not close to the team. People close to the team shouldn't be reading these threads, let alone responding to us! I mean... there's nothing positive that can happen from it, and a lot of negative that can. I really hope I never see someone do something in a game to validate what a poster said, or to show them wrong, and while I'm not implying you would, but even responding to this forum is probably murky waters.
 
Re: SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread

husky12 said:
You must be a hockey mastermind.....

Do you realize when you back check you pick up the forward without the puck? It is the defensmen's job to play the puck carrier, and the forwards job to pick up the trailer (F3). The reason why you don't see Lasch looking like he is back checking is because he is always F1 in the offensive zone. F3 is always going to be your backchecker. Ryan is always in the corners doing the dirty work, so he is expected to pick up the defensemen trailing the play. I think he does just fine.

What is the penalty for a student athlete having a first offense alchohol violation?
Click to expand...

:rolleyes: I was talking about one certain play genius.
 
Re: SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread

BobMotzkoFan said:
scsutommyboy:

I really did not want to post, but after your display of lack of knowledge of the game i felt compelled to. This coming from someone who is close to the team, so i know what im talking about.

On mitchell's goal Raboin started it by turning the puck over at the blueline. Lasch had nothing to do with the play until he hustled back and caught up to Mitchell where he then was just out muscled. Once again if you look at our D over the past few years it has been very suspect which would note why our forwards Plus minus is so bad because we cant get it out of the DEFENSIVE ZONE!!
On top of that when your an offensive player and your down by 1 with a minute to go and your goalie is pulled usually there is a chance where you get scored on 70% of the time. which would mean minus 1.

Another good point mentioned by someone already. Lasch is usually the first forchecker meaning F1 that means he in on the puck in the corners swarming. On a turnover F3 takes the high guy and back checks him while the orginal F1 make sure he has his D man on the way up, so I believe he is back checking just fine and doing his Job. Thanks for your conern though.!

Another note the past four season this team has predominantly lived or died off their PP. Weve rarely had 5 on 5 goals, but when we do guess whos leading the way Lasch with 5.

So in conclusion i think you should have a banned for a week because you dont know one thing about hockey.
Click to expand...

I have to laugh because so many things start on another message board and then trail over here. You are not getting the whole story reading only what I posted on here. I understand how players back check and realize how +/- works. For the record I was talking about the one play and how I thought he should have hauled the guy down. I gave him credit for hustling back, but as a captain he needs to haul him down. This team does not do the little things and in my opinion that is why they are so inconsistent. Guys like Roe and Lasch taking two minute shifts and then not having the gas to hustle back has cost this team on a number of occasions. I realize that didn’t happen in this case, but that is a good example of why his plus minus is not very good for a guy who scores as much as he does.

I completely disagree on your plus/minus take. Plus minus over 3 years is a very good indicator if a player plays two ways. The empty net goal example you use is very weak. All top players on all teams play at the end of a game when their team is down and that type of thing averages out. It’s not like Lasch plays on UAA or Tech and never wins. He has been on two NCAA tourney teams and his +3 shows he is a defensive liability.
 
Re: SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread

SCSU Euro said:
Sorry tb, but I'm still young enough where those of us who aren't still going to SCSU can get in with IDs of our friends up there, so free beats face value. :D



Appreciate the insight, but GOOD GOD, I hope you're not close to the team. People close to the team shouldn't be reading these threads, let alone responding to us! I mean... there's nothing positive that can happen from it, and a lot of negative that can. I really hope I never see someone do something in a game to validate what a poster said, or to show them wrong, and while I'm not implying you would, but even responding to this forum is probably murky waters.
Click to expand...

So was that is dad, mom or girlfriend?:D Players and players families should never read these boards. nobody wants to hear about how their kid made a mistake or isn't a good two way player.
 
Re: SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread

scsutommyboy said:
I have to laugh because so many things start on another message board and then trail over here. You are not getting the whole story reading only what I posted on here. I understand how players back check and realize how +/- works. For the record I was talking about the one play and how I thought he should have hauled the guy down. I gave him credit for hustling back, but as a captain he needs to haul him down. This team does not do the little things and in my opinion that is why they are so inconsistent. Guys like Roe and Lasch taking two minute shifts and then not having the gas to hustle back has cost this team on a number of occasions. I realize that didn’t happen in this case, but that is a good example of why his plus minus is not very good for a guy who scores as much as he does.

I completely disagree on your plus/minus take. Plus minus over 3 years is a very good indicator if a player plays two ways. The empty net goal example you use is very weak. All top players on all teams play at the end of a game when their team is down and that type of thing averages out. It’s not like Lasch plays on UAA or Tech and never wins. He has been on two NCAA tourney teams and his +3 shows he is a defensive liability.
Click to expand...

I agree the +/- being hurt because of empty netters is a bad excuse. So Lasch has never been on the ice when SCSU has scored an empty netter?
 
Re: SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread

SCSU Euro said:
I agree the +/- being hurt because of empty netters is a bad excuse. So Lasch has never been on the ice when SCSU has scored an empty netter?
Click to expand...

some family memembers are a little touchy I guess.:D The bottom line is Lasch is not a good defensive player and even though that is not his main role, his poor defensive play does hurt the team at times. If his family friends don't like my take then don't read the message board. The examples the two brought up don't tell the whole story, but then again I don't know anything about hockey.:D
 
Re: SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread

He wasn't happ with the power play, some guys need to step it up, and the 8 minutes we had the power play may have been the worst in the history of hockey. Maybe a slight exaggeration. Wisconsin was good, but our guys let them have the game.
I think that was it, for the most part. He only talked for about 10 minutes before the equipment guy showed up. Lyons announced that the equipment guy was dead---in about 2 1/2 hours.
 
Re: SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread

scsutommyboy:

I'm Not a family member nor do I consider myself a Friend at all. I Just happen to know common knowledge about the game of hockey unlike you from your remarks and I can tell you that your very outrageous with your comments and it is making you look very bad. You are a spectaor that pays to watch these boys play. Not a coach nor scout. Your clueless into the game and I wouldnt try to analyze it anymore. I'm not to sure Motzko or the boys are worried about his Defensive performance special after this weekend when it was considered the best he has had. His job is to put up points pure and simple if he is not doing that then we have problems.
 
Re: SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread

Lee earns WCHA Rookie of Week honor

St. Cloud State goalie Mike Lee has been named WCHA Rookie of the Week for his performance in a home-ice victory over Wisconsin last Friday at the National Hockey Center.

A 6-0, 190-pound freshman from Roseau, and a draftee of the NHL’s Phoenix Coyotes, Lee was named the first star of the game after turning in a career-best 38-save performance in a 4-1 WCHA win over the visiting Badgers. Lee had period save totals of 15, 10 and 13 while yielding just a power-play goal at 8:49 of the first period. St. Cloud State gained the victory despite being outshot, 39-25.

This season, Lee owns a 2-3-2 overall record, a 2.25 goals-against average, and a .923 saves percentage with 192 stops over 426:03 of action.
 
Re: SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread

BobMotzkoFan said:
scsutommyboy:

I'm Not a family member nor do I consider myself a Friend at all. I Just happen to know common knowledge about the game of hockey unlike you from your remarks and I can tell you that your very outrageous with your comments and it is making you look very bad. You are a spectaor that pays to watch these boys play. Not a coach nor scout. Your clueless into the game and I wouldnt try to analyze it anymore. I'm not to sure Motzko or the boys are worried about his Defensive performance special after this weekend when it was considered the best he has had. His job is to put up points pure and simple if he is not doing that then we have problems.
Click to expand...



It's a stinkin' message board! Did you really come on here thinking you'd see the finer details of hockey being debated?? :confused:

Really, we aren't coaches or scouts? Dang, and here I thought all my wonderful pontifications were going to get me on the short list at the U when Lucia is fired!! :D
 
Re: SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread

BobMotzkoFan said:
scsutommyboy:
I'm Not a family member nor do I consider myself a Friend at all. I Just happen to know common knowledge about the game of hockey unlike you from your remarks and I can tell you that your very outrageous with your comments and it is making you look very bad. You are a spectaor that pays to watch these boys play. Not a coach nor scout. Your clueless into the game and I wouldnt try to analyze it anymore. I'm not to sure Motzko or the boys are worried about his Defensive performance special after this weekend when it was considered the best he has had. His job is to put up points pure and simple if he is not doing that then we have problems.
Click to expand...

Come on folks, if the bolded part isn't a dead giveaway that this is Rabid I don't know what is. He has made that comment numerous times on DaHuskies. Welcome back Rabid (in a sense anyway, since I assumed a number of FTLT posts were yours.) ;)
 
Re: SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread

motox said:
Come on folks, if the bolded part isn't a dead giveaway that this is Rabid I don't know what is. He has made that comment numerous times on DaHuskies. Welcome back Rabid (in a sense anyway, since I assumed a number of FTLT posts were yours.) ;)
Click to expand...

Good work, Motox. Nice try, Rabib.
 
Re: SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread

BobMotzkoFan said:
scsutommyboy:

I'm Not a family member nor do I consider myself a Friend at all. I Just happen to know common knowledge about the game of hockey unlike you from your remarks and I can tell you that your very outrageous with your comments and it is making you look very bad. You are a spectaor that pays to watch these boys play. Not a coach nor scout. Your clueless into the game and I wouldnt try to analyze it anymore. I'm not to sure Motzko or the boys are worried about his Defensive performance special after this weekend when it was considered the best he has had. His job is to put up points pure and simple if he is not doing that then we have problems.
Click to expand...

Oh no you think I look bad.:D I don't get bent out shape about what someone says on the internet. Talking about back checking doesn't tell the whole story and sure wasn't my whole point. Funny you bring up putting up points because I have said countless times that Lasch's value goes way down if he doesn't score. not only is he not scoring enough now he didn't the whole first part of last year when I first brought this up.....I forgot though you know exactly what I think because you read one post of mine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top