What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Drew S. said:
One’s financial situation shouldn’t play any part in whether they can own a gun or not.
Click to expand...

Except it has less to do with their financial situation and more to do with their mental situation. I'm all for the 2nd amendment, but that EO should have been an easy one for everyone to agree on.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Drew S. said:
One’s financial situation shouldn’t play any part in whether they can own a gun or not.

I guess I am so far right I support single payer and a $15 an hour national minimum wage.
Click to expand...

For the last ****ing time. It doesn’t matter if they can afford to write a check.

It does matter if they are writing checks to the Teddy Roosevelt re-election campaign.
 
Last edited:
dxmnkd316 said:
For the last ****ing time. It doesn’t matter if they can afford to write a check.

It does matter if they are writing checks to the Teddy Roosevelt re-election campaign.
Click to expand...

I’m sure you’re under the impression wealth plays no part in who gets into Harvard as well.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Drew S. said:
One’s financial situation shouldn’t play any part in whether they can own a gun or not.

I guess I am so far right I support single payer and a $15 an hour national minimum wage.
Click to expand...

You still can't comprehend what people have told you over and over again. Just how dense are you?

Read this slow, so maybe it will sink in to your boneheaded skull: It's not about their financial situation. It's about them being so mentally disabled they cannot manage whatever financial situation they have. Rich, poor, in between, it doesn't matter. Their mind no longer works properly.

Do you understand that?
 
Last edited:
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

That’s a great comment. Calling oneself a centrist is far too often used as a shield for cowardice.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

dxmnkd316 said:
That’s a great comment. Calling oneself a centrist is far too often used as a shield for cowardice.
Click to expand...

There's no harm in being wrong--certainly no harm in having others think you are wrong. Nothing wrong with being a true centrist either, but it is used as a DMZ too often, IMO.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Drew S. said:
Wrong. I’m back in the greatest place on earth and voting again.
Click to expand...

Great. Suzie needs your support.

Have you figured out the "too mentally disabled to handle their finances" thing yet? Giving flaggy a run for stupidest poster on the board
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

BassAle said:
Lol. Either you’re trolling us or you’re really dumb.
We explained this a million times.
Click to expand...

I'm going with the latter.

I hope his wife makes all the decisions in his household.
 
rufus said:
Great. Suzie needs your support.

Have you figured out the "too mentally disabled to handle their finances" thing yet? Giving flaggy a run for stupidest poster on the board
Click to expand...

I have it figured out much more clearly than you and others on his board. They don’t give people some sort of multiple choice exam. People have had others handle their finances for one of many reasons. I’m not sure if there has ever been any research done on it but I’m very confident but those who are feomcless affluent families are much more heavily impacted by the change.

Also, is there any reasearch that shows they are more of a threat than others?
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Drew S. said:
Also, is there any reasearch that shows they are more of a threat than others?
Click to expand...

You know, that’s an excellent question and the first of yours in this entire saga that raises a good point.

Many people would say it unfairly discriminated against the mentally ill because it means we assume mentally ill people are predisposed to violence.

I don’t think that’s a very strong argument myself. Just because someone isn’t predisposed to violence doesn’t mean I’m ok with them having firearms. It’s possible they might not understand right and wrong or make the complex decision of whether something that they are doing is illegal. They might not understand a situation and react in an unsafe manner.

If they are diagnosed by a medical professional as being severely mentally ill, they shouldn’t have a gun. They don’t need a gun.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top