USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs
- Thread starter FadeToBlack&Gold
- Start date
- Status
solovsfett
Registered User
Kavanaugh is a Russian pawn? Can you send links? I haven’t heard that. I only am aware of his work for W and his stance on Morley vs CIA.
solovsfett
Registered User
If that’s true the CIA will kill him or make him disappear.
aparch
Acetaminamerican
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs
Because Kavanaugh would help make the case against their involvement disappear.
From CNBC last July: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/20/rus...eme-court-pick-in-bid-to-dismiss-charges.html
Because Kavanaugh would help make the case against their involvement disappear.
From CNBC last July: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/20/rus...eme-court-pick-in-bid-to-dismiss-charges.html
No one yelled "Coup-fourré!" during the Trump tower meeting. So since the Russians weren't explicitly told they were breaking they law, they couldn't have broken the law.
dxmnkd316
Lucia Apologist
solovsfett
Registered User
Have you read Blowback by Christopher Simpson or The Devil’s Chessboard by David Talbot? It’s pretty clear when the Company wants someone terminated they make it happen.
EDIT: so if Assange is a tool of Russia (which I doubt, I think he’s a freelancing narcissist), he’s on a list no doubt and will be targeted by Haspel.
Last edited:
FadeToBlack&Gold
Microlot Marxist
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs
To own the libs. Putin and his cadre of mafioso oligarchs hate powerful women and Western ideas of feminism and breaking the glass ceiling. Why do you think they did what they could to interfere and persuade in 2016?
Women are basically pieces of meat over there, as well as in China. In some ways, it's actually worse for them now than it was in Soviet/Mao times.
This, too.
Also, Kav's opinions on executive privilege. They want Trump as stooge for another six years, at least.
To own the libs. Putin and his cadre of mafioso oligarchs hate powerful women and Western ideas of feminism and breaking the glass ceiling. Why do you think they did what they could to interfere and persuade in 2016?
Women are basically pieces of meat over there, as well as in China. In some ways, it's actually worse for them now than it was in Soviet/Mao times.
This, too.
Also, Kav's opinions on executive privilege. They want Trump as stooge for another six years, at least.
Last edited:
unofan
Well-known member
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs
You're talking to someone who believes the CIA killed Kennedy.
You're talking to someone who believes the CIA killed Kennedy.
solovsfett
Registered User
Yes, they did l. Allen Dulles orchestrated it. If you don’t believe me then you can maybe read about Charles DeGaulle, Richard Nixon, Robert and Jackie Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Nikita Kruschev, Fidel Castro, Gerald Ford and a host of CIA officers who basically admitted it and i’ll Find you all of the quotes and documents.
FadeToBlack&Gold
Microlot Marxist
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs
Oh I know, but I'll indulge him for a few posts.
I liked him a lot better over in the music thread, when just talked about the late 80s/early 90s period.
Oh I know, but I'll indulge him for a few posts.
I liked him a lot better over in the music thread, when just talked about the late 80s/early 90s period.
solovsfett
Registered User
I have no idea *** Putin’s thinking is. To me if wants Trump and Putin over Clinton he’s bat**** crazy.
solovsfett
Registered User
Oh I know, but I'll indulge him for a few posts.
I liked him a lot better over in the music thread, when just talked about the late 80s/early 90s period.
Oh, I don’t know:
https://t.co/8t74ql2jKe?amp=1
https://ratical.org/ratville/JFK/Unspeakable/JamesWilcottJFK+US.html
https://youtu.be/OmRhdOvzyQQ
https://t.co/Dm9vaXvWmH?amp=1
http://nixontapeaudio.org/rmh/587-007a.mp3
Maybe take a look. It’s impossible to argue on this particular point if you don’t Have the information.
Now we could do it with conventional weapons, but that could take years and cost millions of lives. No, I think we have to go all out. I think that this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody’s part.
FadeToBlack&Gold
Microlot Marxist
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs
<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/Ow59c0pwTPruU/giphy.gif"></img>
<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/Ow59c0pwTPruU/giphy.gif"></img>
solovsfett
Registered User
If you want the information it’s available. I’ll post if you’re not willing to look.
FadeToBlack&Gold
Microlot Marxist
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs
Seems you already have, and (unsurprisingly) it's from a series of "sources" that would make Flaggy cream himself. So you are, unfortunately, part of the #FakeNews problem.
Good night.
Seems you already have, and (unsurprisingly) it's from a series of "sources" that would make Flaggy cream himself. So you are, unfortunately, part of the #FakeNews problem.
Good night.
solovsfett
Registered User
Uhm, Nixon saying “I don’t know who got John” is a dubious source? In other words the White House tapes are dubious? RFK and Jackie we’re crazy? Gerald Ford admitting to a french ambassador the WC was fiction is a lie? RFK Jr and Kathleen Kennedy-Townsend are nuts? David Talbot, founder of Salon.com and prolific writer for numerous outlets including the Atlantic is nuts or dubious?
Jefferson Morley, former Wapo reporter is nuts or lying no? John Newman (military intelligence officer for 20 years and U Maryland professor) is nuts or dubious? I mean seriously, think about what these people have unearthed. Fletcher Prouty, Sergei Kruschev and on and on. ALL of these people are nutcases?
C’mon! Read, absorb, think it over. JFK/X/MLK/RFK didn’t get to write their histories. The victors wrote it. And their successors continue to obscure what happened.
Vietnam doesn’t happen if jfk lives, but ah well. Secret intelligence agencies operating above the law can’t happen here I guess
Last edited:
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs
We have a conspiracy thread for a reason...lets keep this crap there.
Assange is completely owned. His "sources" were all in the Kremlin when he was going after Hillary and it was proven quite easily. Hell every time he "had a big bombshell" it coincided with a Kremlin hack or something else linked to Russia. When one was proven false just hours before his "big announcement" he then delayed the announcement because of "death threats" that were never substantiated. He is a fraud who, even if at one time was about freeing up knowledge to protect the world cares more about his pocket book and his ego than that now and has been that way for at least a decade.
Hell, in 2016 he was Real Time and Bill asked him to find Trump's tax returns, Julian said he would...and funny never happened. Meanwhile the NYT's was able to put it together two years later without hacking anyone. And the Times had every reason to not do it since they had been enabling his BS since the late 70's and still equivocate for him now.
We have a conspiracy thread for a reason...lets keep this crap there.
Assange is completely owned. His "sources" were all in the Kremlin when he was going after Hillary and it was proven quite easily. Hell every time he "had a big bombshell" it coincided with a Kremlin hack or something else linked to Russia. When one was proven false just hours before his "big announcement" he then delayed the announcement because of "death threats" that were never substantiated. He is a fraud who, even if at one time was about freeing up knowledge to protect the world cares more about his pocket book and his ego than that now and has been that way for at least a decade.
Hell, in 2016 he was Real Time and Bill asked him to find Trump's tax returns, Julian said he would...and funny never happened. Meanwhile the NYT's was able to put it together two years later without hacking anyone. And the Times had every reason to not do it since they had been enabling his BS since the late 70's and still equivocate for him now.
solovsfett
Registered User
Thanks. I honestly haven’t followed a lot of the Assange stuff over the years.I’ll check into it for sure. I’m only familiar with his vault 7 release as that popped up on my twitter feed quite a bit.
- Status