What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">President Trump: "It's a very scary time for young men in America, when you can be guilty of something that you may not be guilty of."<br><br>Bro, this is basically Colin Kaepernick’s whole point.</p>— Dave Pell (@davepell) <a href="https://twitter.com/davepell/status/1047212270076346368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 2, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

What this tweet fails to realize is Trump is referring to white men.
 
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

ScoobyDoo said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">President Trump: "It's a very scary time for young men in America, when you can be guilty of something that you may not be guilty of."<br><br>Bro, this is basically Colin Kaepernick’s whole point.</p>— Dave Pell (@davepell) <a href="https://twitter.com/davepell/status/1047212270076346368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 2, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

What this tweet fails to realize is Trump is referring to white men.
Click to expand...

They're the only ones that matter. Older and richer, the better.
 
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

burd said:
There are. I know may of them.
Click to expand...

Lucky you. The conservatives in my family are full nutbar. The ones I run into in airports and hotel lounges will sometimes admit they don't like the Tweeting or his temperament, but they looooooooove the tax cuts and the judge picks, still hate Hillary, and the Dems really need to stop whining and cooperate. :rolleyes:
 
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

FadeToBlack&Gold said:
Lucky you. The conservatives in my family are full nutbar. The ones I run into in airports and hotel lounges will sometimes admit they don't like the Tweeting or his temperament, but they looooooooove the tax cuts and the judge picks, still hate Hillary, and the Dems really need to stop whining and cooperate. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

No. I have to deal with the same jackazz policies you do. But simply declaring them all deplorables will get us nothing and possibly cost us some insight that might help us figure this insanity out.
 
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

John Paul Stevens says Kavanaugh doesn't belong on the SC. What would he know though...
 
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

Handyman said:
John Paul Stevens says Kavanaugh doesn't belong on the SC. What would he know though...
Click to expand...

And for the reason that has been lost in the discussion: he flunked the temperament test right there in front of everyone. No proof problems or investigations needed. He shat himself when it was all on the line.
 
burd said:
And for the reason that has been lost in the discussion: he flunked the temperament test right there in front of everyone. No proof problems or investigations needed. He shat himself when it was all on the line.
Click to expand...

Yeah but come on he is a white male doesn't he deserve a break??
 
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

And dump ripped on Franken tonight at his rally.

Unreal.
 
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

FadeToBlack&Gold said:
No, there really aren't at this point. The election of Trump means there is no longer a sane moderate conservative in America.
Click to expand...

I was about to point out the handful of "Never-Trumpers" but realized that they're mostly angry that Trump is bellowing what they dog whistled
 
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

FadeToBlack&Gold said:
Lucky you. The conservatives in my family are full nutbar. The ones I run into in airports and hotel lounges will sometimes admit they don't like the Tweeting or his temperament, but they looooooooove the tax cuts and the judge picks, still hate Hillary, and the Dems really need to stop whining and cooperate. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I have one liberal nutbar in my immediate family, and one conservative nutbar (an inlaw of my brother's, and my brother is a widower, so don't know if the "ties" still bind). And when I say nutbar, I mean nutbar. It's insane. I will apologize to those that are affected by the following comment:

Both of the nutbars make Scooby and Flaggy seem unbiased. Not even joking.
 
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

Brenthoven said:
I have one liberal nutbar in my immediate family, and one conservative nutbar (an inlaw of my brother's, and my brother is a widower, so don't know if the "ties" still bind).
Click to expand...

Oh yeah, we have the one Bern-out, too.
 
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Washington Post editorial board calls for "no" vote on Supreme Court nominee for first time in over 30 years <a href="https://t.co/9NHJDRiGN7">https://t.co/9NHJDRiGN7</a> <a href="https://t.co/dJTp2smcbe">pic.twitter.com/dJTp2smcbe</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1048078102058946560?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

First time WaPo has opposed a Supreme Court nominee since 1987. (Robert Bork) That is right none of the justices, even Thomas, were opposed by the editorial board. That is how unfit they feel Kavanaugh is.

Yes I know it doesnt matter...just proves a point. They join Law Professors, Christian Church groups and many others who feel this guy is unfit. Soros man...his money does wonders!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">What do <br>-The Catholic Journal<br>-The largest organization of Christian churches<br>-Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens<br>all have in common? <br>They all think Kavanaugh should not be on the Supreme Court.<br>None of them are Liberals.<br>None of them are pro Roe v Wade.</p>— Ana Navarro (@ananavarro) <a href="https://twitter.com/ananavarro/status/1047959372385673223?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Last edited:
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is Senator Orrin Hatch waving off & dismissing women who are trying to talk to him. Remember every single Republican like Senator Hatch who is dismissing the voice of survivors. Remember these moments, these images, & then go vote. <a href="https://t.co/wUJCRSnD1z">pic.twitter.com/wUJCRSnD1z</a></p>— Simar (@sahluwal) <a href="https://twitter.com/sahluwal/status/1047972067121876992?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top