unofan
Well-known member
Nope. The GOP voters consistently care about SCOTUS more than Dems, which is a huge fault of the Dems.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
- Thread starter joecct
- Start date
- Status
Nope. The GOP voters consistently care about SCOTUS more than Dems, which is a huge fault of the Dems.
unofan
Well-known member
It's technically correct (the best kind of correct). He won't overturn it, he'll just restrict it to death.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Grassley: "Don’t tell me we haven’t spent enough time" on Kavanaugh nomination <a href="https://t.co/gLRhTTaZBY">https://t.co/gLRhTTaZBY</a></p>— Talking Points Memo (@TPM) <a href="https://twitter.com/TPM/status/1047922680517873666?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
This coming from the party who brought you EMAILZ, and BENGHAZI.
God, I love that party. They have no shame. They're shameless.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Grassley: "Don’t tell me we haven’t spent enough time" on Kavanaugh nomination <a href="https://t.co/gLRhTTaZBY">https://t.co/gLRhTTaZBY</a></p>— Talking Points Memo (@TPM) <a href="https://twitter.com/TPM/status/1047922680517873666?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
This coming from the party who brought you EMAILZ, and BENGHAZI.
God, I love that party. They have no shame. They're shameless.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
Exactly. And that's why it's hilarious.
Exactly. And that's why it's hilarious.
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
No. I dont know anyone who is a single issue voter on the Dem side unless that single issue is "Equal Rights For All" which is hardly a single issue.
No one votes Dem just because of them being pro choice.
No. I dont know anyone who is a single issue voter on the Dem side unless that single issue is "Equal Rights For All" which is hardly a single issue.
No one votes Dem just because of them being pro choice.
The Sicatoka
Kicizapi Cetan
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
Because the allegations are ... unsubstantiated ... according to the DFL's investigator?
Because the Minneapolis police are looking for another force to investigate (citing conflict of interest concerns)?
Because the allegations are ... unsubstantiated ... according to the DFL's investigator?
Because the Minneapolis police are looking for another force to investigate (citing conflict of interest concerns)?
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
No it is because it stopped being a talking point for you all to hold against us the second he did what Kavanaugh didnt have the balls to do.
No it is because it stopped being a talking point for you all to hold against us the second he did what Kavanaugh didnt have the balls to do.
The Sicatoka
Kicizapi Cetan
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
Indubitably. It's about the big picture and the long game.
Indubitably. It's about the big picture and the long game.
The Sicatoka
Kicizapi Cetan
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
I did say the investigation found the allegations were unsubstantiated. There's nothing to talk about. Right?
I did say the investigation found the allegations were unsubstantiated. There's nothing to talk about. Right?
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Why aren't any of these reporters at the presser asking any of these angry & defensive Republican senators about the numerous lies that Kavanaugh told under oath *to them* last Thursday? Sexual assault claims aside, those lies on their own should be enough to disqualify him.</p>— Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) <a href="https://twitter.com/mehdirhasan/status/1047924316388642816?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Good question. Media blew it there.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Why aren't any of these reporters at the presser asking any of these angry & defensive Republican senators about the numerous lies that Kavanaugh told under oath *to them* last Thursday? Sexual assault claims aside, those lies on their own should be enough to disqualify him.</p>— Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) <a href="https://twitter.com/mehdirhasan/status/1047924316388642816?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Good question. Media blew it there.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
Career criminal tells it like it is.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Just read the FBI report on Kavanaugh - if that’s an investigation, it’s a bull**** investigation. <a href="https://t.co/9D8oeVMEoU">pic.twitter.com/9D8oeVMEoU</a></p>— Senator Bob Menendez (@SenatorMenendez) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenatorMenendez/status/1047924865427263488?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Career criminal tells it like it is.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Just read the FBI report on Kavanaugh - if that’s an investigation, it’s a bull**** investigation. <a href="https://t.co/9D8oeVMEoU">pic.twitter.com/9D8oeVMEoU</a></p>— Senator Bob Menendez (@SenatorMenendez) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenatorMenendez/status/1047924865427263488?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
St. Clown
Ideas Posted are Likely Not My Own
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
No, the investigation was handcuffed by POTUS. That means there's a lot to talk about.
No, the investigation was handcuffed by POTUS. That means there's a lot to talk about.
FadeToBlack&Gold
Microlot Marxist
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
I was just about to say, Menendez would know.
I was just about to say, Menendez would know.
The Sicatoka
Kicizapi Cetan
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
Flake helped Kavanaugh?
https://www.weeklystandard.com/john...week-delay-helped-clear-brett-kavanaughs-name
Flake helped Kavanaugh?
https://www.weeklystandard.com/john...week-delay-helped-clear-brett-kavanaughs-name
The Sicatoka
Kicizapi Cetan
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
Wrong investigation. I was speaking of Ellison. What were you thinking about ...
Wrong investigation. I was speaking of Ellison. What were you thinking about ...
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">North Carolina GOP leader shares fake photo mocking Ford for her looks <a href="https://t.co/ssgfpkWUCa">https://t.co/ssgfpkWUCa</a> <a href="https://t.co/5SiannipLT">pic.twitter.com/5SiannipLT</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1047913265123057665?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">North Carolina GOP leader shares fake photo mocking Ford for her looks <a href="https://t.co/ssgfpkWUCa">https://t.co/ssgfpkWUCa</a> <a href="https://t.co/5SiannipLT">pic.twitter.com/5SiannipLT</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1047913265123057665?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Ford’s legal team releases letter to FBI director Wray questioning why their client was not interviewed during the supplemental investigation and actually offers names of people who “would have challenged” Kavanaugh’s credibility. <a href="https://t.co/ONbBq6HmU2">pic.twitter.com/ONbBq6HmU2</a></p>— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) <a href="https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1047889881001811971?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Ford’s legal team releases letter to FBI director Wray questioning why their client was not interviewed during the supplemental investigation and actually offers names of people who “would have challenged” Kavanaugh’s credibility. <a href="https://t.co/ONbBq6HmU2">pic.twitter.com/ONbBq6HmU2</a></p>— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) <a href="https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1047889881001811971?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">HAPPENING NOW: Protesters march to voice opposition to Brett Kavanaugh. <a href="https://t.co/SwoY8kIGX1">pic.twitter.com/SwoY8kIGX1</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1047912866408538114?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">HAPPENING NOW: Protesters march to voice opposition to Brett Kavanaugh. <a href="https://t.co/SwoY8kIGX1">pic.twitter.com/SwoY8kIGX1</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1047912866408538114?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
I guess you missed the Monty Python reference.
JF_Gophers
2147483647
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
Why are we still talking about this? Hes in as an SCJ. Lets move on to how dems wont vote in numbers and the Republicans will keep the house and senate.
Why are we still talking about this? Hes in as an SCJ. Lets move on to how dems wont vote in numbers and the Republicans will keep the house and senate.
- Status