What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

trixR4kids said:
Yeah I'm sure they're all just mis-remembering attempted sexual assault and putting their entire livelihood on the line when in reality he just wasn't at any of these parties that everyone seems to remember him at, yearbooks corroborate, Mark Judge would probably corroborate if he was under oath and willing to testify (he's not or Republicans won't let him). And I'm sure the Republicans just had 65 women lined up knowing that it was all a ridiculous easily disprovable lie that was going to come out. All the accusers want is a thorough FBI investigation which they wouldn't be asking for if they were lying or "mis-remembering" (no mention of what exactly you think they were mis-remembering of course or the fact that people who have or even haven't been sexually assaulted sometimes mis-remember things).
Click to expand...

Well, Kav's calendar from 1982 certainly didn't do much to exonerate him. There's an entry for July 1st about heading over "to Timmy's for skis w/Judge, Tom, PJ, Bernie, Squi". Skis almost certainly a reference to 'brewskis', and Judge and PJ being two other boys that Ford has alleged were at the party where she was assaulted.



Also has Beach Week penciled in, and we all know what Swetnick alleges happened during Beach Weeks.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Handyman said:
It has to be more than pictures...whatever Trump has on Graham has to be amazing because he is banking everything on this confirmation.

When you cant fight the facts attack the messenger. That is all the GOP has left attack Avenatti.
Click to expand...

I don't know. Maybe the Orgasms after Gorsuch and the Tax Cut were enough to put him all in?
 
Drew S. said:
Lying is a deliberate act. I don’t think anyone accusing him of various things is doing that. Are all of them remembering what happened clearly? I’m not as sure on that, and it applies to Kavanaugh as well.
Click to expand...

He started off his nomination process by lying "no president has ever sought more input from more sources than this one."

If he's willing to lie about minor shiat like that, what in God's green earth makes you think he isn't lying about the important stuff?
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Uh oh.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/su...eclarations-supporting-her-allegation-n913216

Now Ford is backing up her claims with sworn declarations.

Kavanaugh accuser Ford provides four sworn declarations supporting her allegation
The signed documents — from Ford's husband and three friends — were sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday night.
Click to expand...

And Avenatti has a sworn affadavit.

That's more than they had on Franken.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

BTW for the people who equivocated Keith Ellison:

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1045032273203142657?s=19

"Today I am announcing that I will submit a request for a House Ethics Committee investigation into allegations against me raised by a former partner. I am taking this step now because I am innocent and eager to see this entire matter resolved," Ellison told the news outlet.

"In addition to any House Ethics investigation, an independent investigation has been conducted by an independent attorney. I have complied fully with that investigation, the results of which should be made public soon," he continued.

Notice the difference...
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">.<a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ChuckGrassley</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@LindseyGrahamSC</a> - Are you three privileged, white men calling my client Julie a liar? How dare you attack a sexual assault victim. She has risked her life to do the right thing. You should be ashamed of yourselves. Your actions are disgraceful.</p>— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) <a href="https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1045028934277115905?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 26, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Tweeted at Sentor Grassley and leader of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Lindsey Graham, and the President of the United States.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Handyman said:
BTW for the people who equivocated Keith Ellison:

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1045032273203142657?s=19

"Today I am announcing that I will submit a request for a House Ethics Committee investigation into allegations against me raised by a former partner. I am taking this step now because I am innocent and eager to see this entire matter resolved," Ellison told the news outlet.

"In addition to any House Ethics investigation, an independent investigation has been conducted by an independent attorney. I have complied fully with that investigation, the results of which should be made public soon," he continued.

Notice the difference...
Click to expand...

Both sides are the same.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Handyman said:
BTW for the people who equivocated Keith Ellison:

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1045032273203142657?s=19

"Today I am announcing that I will submit a request for a House Ethics Committee investigation into allegations against me raised by a former partner. I am taking this step now because I am innocent and eager to see this entire matter resolved," Ellison told the news outlet.

"In addition to any House Ethics investigation, an independent investigation has been conducted by an independent attorney. I have complied fully with that investigation, the results of which should be made public soon," he continued.

Notice the difference...
Click to expand...

I do. He's doing what Democrats have to do. Republicans just have to say, "I didn't do it" really loud and then blame and shame the victim.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

ScoobyDoo said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">.<a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ChuckGrassley</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@LindseyGrahamSC</a> - Are you three privileged, white men calling my client Julie a liar? How dare you attack a sexual assault victim. She has risked her life to do the right thing. You should be ashamed of yourselves. Your actions are disgraceful.</p>— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) <a href="https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1045028934277115905?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 26, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Tweeted at Sentor Grassley and leader of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Lindsey Graham, and the President of the United States.
Click to expand...

Why I like Avenatti. He fights.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

The other thing about that. for him to fight like that, he has to be damm sure that whatever he's got is legit. He has to have done his homework.


Unlike our current administration, who can't even send out a congratulatory letter properly.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

This has been around for a week or so now but it's one of my faves.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">US Rep. Kevin Cramer on Kavanaugh allegations: “Even if it’s all true ... does it disqualify him from the Supreme Court?” <a href="https://t.co/R8HjCctZ5N">https://t.co/R8HjCctZ5N</a></p>— NBC Politics (@NBCPolitics) <a href="https://twitter.com/NBCPolitics/status/1044629282415349761?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Drew S. said:
Lying is a deliberate act. I don’t think anyone accusing him of various things is doing that. Are all of them remembering what happened clearly? I’m not as sure on that, and it applies to Kavanaugh as well.
Click to expand...

Good god. We have three accusers now, have we not, all of whom allege specific acts of sexual assault. You are saying they are all three telling the truth but have inaccurate or mistaken memories? All of them?

And that Kavanaugh, who expressly denies anything remotely close to what happened is telling the truth but is similarly mistaken??

If you need to jump through such hoops to deny, just deny.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

When does defending this man become a bridge too far? The list of idiots who came out and defended Kavanaugh and ripped everyone on the left for a "rush to judgement" all have egg on their face.

Good luck cleaning it off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top