What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

burd said:
Predicted evangelical's answer: I am prohibited from committing sexual assault with my *****. (equating sexual assault with committing or aiding in the commission of murder of a human being in my body).
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's always the same argument. It's two people, not one. And since it's two people you don't get to do whatever you want with your body cause you're sharing it with someone else.
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

ScoobyDoo said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Can you think of any laws that give the government the power to make decisions about the male body?<a href="https://t.co/lDcXPZ56hX">pic.twitter.com/lDcXPZ56hX</a></p>— Kamala Harris (@SenKamalaHarris) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenKamalaHarris/status/1037546600883802112?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 6, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I think I'm in love with Kamala Harris.
Click to expand...

"Selective Service" has been the popular middle-aged white male response.

Because, you know, it's totally the same thing. :rolleyes:
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A newly released email by Brett Kavanaugh, weighing in on the future of abortion rights, is putting new pressure on two moderate Republicans who hold the keys to his confirmation <a href="https://t.co/g5e2EUVq1Y">https://t.co/g5e2EUVq1Y</a></p>— POLITICO (@politico) <a href="https://twitter.com/politico/status/1037832833199419392?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 6, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I expect her to get "assurances" from the WH any minute now to make sure she votes the right way ;)
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

More has leaked:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The NYT has obtained some of the secret "committee confidential" Kavanaugh emails Republicans have kept secret, including one in which he challenges a description of Roe v Wade as the "settled law of the land." <a href="https://t.co/yb8S5U0DmF">https://t.co/yb8S5U0DmF</a></p>— Charlie Savage (@charlie_savage) <a href="https://twitter.com/charlie_savage/status/1037696284784779264?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 6, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

Handyman said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A newly released email by Brett Kavanaugh, weighing in on the future of abortion rights, is putting new pressure on two moderate Republicans who hold the keys to his confirmation <a href="https://t.co/g5e2EUVq1Y">https://t.co/g5e2EUVq1Y</a></p>— POLITICO (@politico) <a href="https://twitter.com/politico/status/1037832833199419392?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 6, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I expect her to get "assurances" from the WH any minute now to make sure she votes the right way ;)
Click to expand...

She's a lock.
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

Agreed. The excuses have softened the messages enough for them to sign up. But not enough for them to 'be concerned'.
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s use of the term “abortion-inducing drugs” spawned a hashtag, #abortioninducingdrugs, on Twitter.
Click to expand...

As I understand it Kavanaugh’s definition of “abortion-inducing drugs” is contraception. Boy, that's mainstream.
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

ScoobyDoo said:
As I understand it Kavanaugh’s definition of “abortion-inducing drugs” is contraception. Boy, that's mainstream.
Click to expand...

That is how it sounded yes.

Senator Cornyn was threatening Booker by reading the rules and the punishments and Booker said "Bring it". I think he has his campaign slogan ;)
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

Handyman said:
That is how it sounded yes.

Senator Cornyn was threatening Booker by reading the rules and the punishments and Booker said "Bring it". I think he has his campaign slogan ;)
Click to expand...

Yeah, I liked that and his fellow Democrats backed him up.
 
Handyman said:
That is how it sounded yes.

Senator Cornyn was threatening Booker by reading the rules and the punishments and Booker said "Bring it". I think he has his campaign slogan ;)
Click to expand...

67 votes to expel. Like an impeachment, not going to happen.
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

ScoobyDoo said:
As I understand it Kavanaugh’s definition of “abortion-inducing drugs” is contraception. Boy, that's mainstream.
Click to expand...

What was he supposed to say? "Plan B"?

Or is the issue that the drug is not inducing an abortion but instead a) temporarily stops the release of an egg from the ovary, or b) prevents fertilization, or c) prevents a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus.
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

You cant abort an unfertilized egg. That is physically impossible.
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">My colleague Senator Blumenthal asked Kavanaugh earlier if a judge should be attacked, as our president has done repeatedly, because of their heritage and race.<br><br>He refused to answer the question. That's not a hard one.</p>— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) <a href="https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/1037832721110892544?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 6, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

The Sicatoka said:
What was he supposed to say? "Plan B"?

Or is the issue that the drug is not inducing an abortion but instead a) temporarily stops the release of an egg from the ovary, or b) prevents fertilization, or c) prevents a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus.
Click to expand...

Handyman said:
You cant abort an unfertilized egg. That is physically impossible.
Click to expand...

What about what Plan B does to the c) option in the list of things it does? Those words are from the Plan B website. It says it "prevents a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus". What would that be called if not an abortion (as the egg is fertilized)? If Plan B causes option c, wouldn't Kavanaugh's description be accurate?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top