thirdtime's . . .
Active member
Here's this year's quickie go-to for updates and general pan-conference awareness.
Not really happy to start the thread with the Harvard — St Michael's score, so I won’t. Suffice it to say SOG were 67-3. Really not the best way for either team to build a head of steam. There are tune-ups, and then there are tune-ups. Not helpful going forward. Anyway, some new “talent" on the block “calling” the game for Harvard, but really how does one call this ducks-in-a-barrel show? Give them credit for highlighting St. M’s players "who knew what they signed up for” (!) and coach Meghan Sweezey, who apparently is a committed developer of the girls’/women’s game and is trying to engineer a full re-build.
Would I have started this thread with a loss? Probably not, but this W does not feel so good.
Not really happy to start the thread with the Harvard — St Michael's score, so I won’t. Suffice it to say SOG were 67-3. Really not the best way for either team to build a head of steam. There are tune-ups, and then there are tune-ups. Not helpful going forward. Anyway, some new “talent" on the block “calling” the game for Harvard, but really how does one call this ducks-in-a-barrel show? Give them credit for highlighting St. M’s players "who knew what they signed up for” (!) and coach Meghan Sweezey, who apparently is a committed developer of the girls’/women’s game and is trying to engineer a full re-build.
Would I have started this thread with a loss? Probably not, but this W does not feel so good.
Last edited:
