What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

F

FlagDUDE08

Banned
2018's off-season is going to be a rule change year. What sort of things are under consideration this time around?

Hopefully it won't be as bad as 2010 was.
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

what I'd like to see:

"Aggressive" and "Dangerous" fouls are non releaseable - you must serve the full 2 minutes.
Can't ice from the defensive zone on the PK.

D3 men have the option of RRL as an officiating system.
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

Go to a 10 minute overtime instead of 5 minutes....BUT NO Shoot-Outs....
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

Ma#1ne Hky said:
Go to a 10 minute overtime instead of 5 minutes....BUT NO Shoot-Outs....
Click to expand...

10 minute OT sounds good but then you'd have to resurface the ice after the 3rd period. I agree on the no shootouts thing as far as the NCAA is concerned but if a conference wants to do them for conference standings only so be it. I'm not a fan of them but for conference points they are tolerable. I like the idea of a 1o minute OT but there is the resurfacing issue though.
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

So at how many minutes would they have to resurface if at 5 they don't and 10 they do? Would 6,7 or 8 minute OT's be OK?
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

joecct said:
what I'd like to see:

"Aggressive" and "Dangerous" fouls are non releaseable - you must serve the full 2 minutes.
Can't ice from the defensive zone on the PK.

D3 men have the option of RRL as an officiating system.
Click to expand...

2010 called, and they want their terrible ideas back. :p
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

BC/HE said:
So at how many minutes would they have to resurface if at 5 they don't and 10 they do? Would 6,7 or 8 minute OT's be OK?
Click to expand...

IMHO you shouldn't go beyond 25 total minutes of play without resurfacing for safety reasons. Even in the NHL they do a dry scrape just prior to the Shootout. They used to do a full resurface down the center (2 passes only) but that took too much time and ruined the flow of the game. Like I said I like the idea of going 10 minutes but you'd need to add an if necessary intermission. That would be ify.

*Please note, that is just my opinion based on conversations with players over the years.
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

Back in the dark ages (pre mid 90s), all NCAA overtimes were 10 minutes.

Then the evil CCHA went to 5 minute OTs and the rest of the NCAA soon followed.

And nobody resurfaced
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

joecct said:
Back in the dark ages (pre mid 90s), all NCAA overtimes were 10 minutes.

Then the evil CCHA went to 5 minute OTs and the rest of the NCAA soon followed.

And nobody resurfaced
Click to expand...

Sure, blame it on us....
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

The more and more i see linesman try to decide what icing is, the more confusing it gets. The "new" icing is probably here to stay but i would look to try and improve it if there's a way.
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

As much as I hate slowing down a game, review replay before a major is called. Major for "contact to the head" should at least involve contacting the head.

And redefine interference. If pick plays are acceptable a the rule needs to reflect it.
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

pdt1081 said:
As much as I hate slowing down a game, review replay before a major is called. Major for "contact to the head" should at least involve contacting the head.

And redefine interference. If pick plays are acceptable a the rule needs to reflect it.
Click to expand...

They already review them in the playoffs, so it was probably a pilot; wouldn't be surprised if it comes to the regular season. I do agree, especially with the whole league forcing timeouts during the game, that games are getting long. I remember when it was a nice 2 hours.
 
FlagDUDE08 said:
They already review them in the playoffs, so it was probably a pilot; wouldn't be surprised if it comes to the regular season. I do agree, especially with the whole league forcing timeouts during the game, that games are getting long. I remember when it was a nice 2 hours.
Click to expand...
Along with that, media timeouts need addressed as well. If a team calls a timeout, do a media timeout. Reviewing a play, do a media timeout. There's no reason to have these long delays for reviews, injuries, and team timeouts, to then turn around and have a media timeout at the very next whistle. Happens almost every game and drags them out even longer.
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

pdt1081 said:
Along with that, media timeouts need addressed as well. If a team calls a timeout, do a media timeout. Reviewing a play, do a media timeout. There's no reason to have these long delays for reviews, injuries, and team timeouts, to then turn around and have a media timeout at the very next whistle. Happens almost every game and drags them out even longer.
Click to expand...

This!!! Yet another factor corroding the appeal of our game and, in turn, contributing to the steady decline in the numbers of butts in the seats.
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

pdt1081 said:
Along with that, media timeouts need addressed as well. If a team calls a timeout, do a media timeout. Reviewing a play, do a media timeout. There's no reason to have these long delays for reviews, injuries, and team timeouts, to then turn around and have a media timeout at the very next whistle. Happens almost every game and drags them out even longer.
Click to expand...

And for crying out loud, no media timeouts after goals!
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

FlagDUDE08 said:
And for crying out loud, no media timeouts after goals!
Click to expand...
They're not supposed to have them after goals.
Of course it never fails that the next whistle is mere seconds later, so all the momentum is lost anyhow.
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

Ban media timeouts (burn them all between periods, pregame and post game), 20 minute OT (who doesn't want to watch more free hockey, what's the rush to get home?), call all interference, review no plays (didn't have reviews for how many years and the game survived just fine).
 
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?

Timothy A said:
Ban media timeouts (burn them all between periods, pregame and post game), 20 minute OT (who doesn't want to watch more free hockey, what's the rush to get home?), call all interference, review no plays (didn't have reviews for how many years and the game survived just fine).
Click to expand...

Gonna make them use wood sticks also?

r
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top