What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI vs Union-Mayor's Cup 1/24/15

Re: RPI vs Union-Mayor's Cup 1/24/15

Wow, RPI is actually going to get a power play?!?!?!

Union is a VERY coddled team.

Of course, that would be a blessing in disguise, as this will just be pass pass turnover.

But if it's a thrown stick, shouldn't that be a penalty shot?
 
Re: RPI vs Union-Mayor's Cup 1/24/15

I thought a thrown stick meant a penalty shot.

But then, last week I thought that icing couldn't be called if the puck went through the crease, so my expertise on the current rule book is seriously in question. ;)
 
Re: RPI vs Union-Mayor's Cup 1/24/15

Seems like we almost never take fewer penalties than any opponent and tonight is no difference
 
Re: RPI vs Union-Mayor's Cup 1/24/15

Waite21 said:
I thought a thrown stick meant a penalty shot.

But then, last week I thought that icing couldn't be called if the puck went through the crease, so my expertise on the current rule book is seriously in question. ;)
Click to expand...

Thrown stick being a penalty shot is definitely in the rule book, but is one of those obscure rules you don't see often. And indeed, Rule 55 allows for a penalty shot.

Be aware that Appert COULD HAVE declined the penalty shot for a minor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top