Ralph Baer 6- 1- 3 15 points .750
engineerhockeyfan 3- 1- 0 6 points .750
fr joe 1- 2- 1 3 points .375
RPI92 1- 1- 0 2 points .500
DrDemento 1- 2- 0 2 points .333
fishcore12 0- 0- 1 1 point .500
jmhusker 0- 1- 0 0 points .000
Ralph Baer 50-45-17 117 points .522
fr joe 43-49-11 97 points .471
engineerhockeyfan 24-25- 5 53 points .491
Red Cloud 11- 3- 1 23 points .767
hockeyhound 11-14- 1 23 points .442
GRussinko 10-15- 2 22 points .407
DrDemento 7-20- 4 18 points .290
burgie12 6- 2- 1 13 points .722
rpihockeyfan13 6- 6- 1 13 points .500
RPIBMW 4- 5- 1 9 points .450
FlagDUDE08 4- 0- 0 8 points 1.000
HighlanderRPI 3- 4- 1 7 points .438
Waite21 2- 6- 2 6 points .300
jericho 3-10- 0 6 points .231
JCrawford 2- 1- 0 4 points .667
REDRocket 2- 3- 0 4 points .400
RPIHFH 1- 1- 1 3 points .500
JennyRN 1- 1- 1 3 points .500
fishcore12 0- 0- 3 3 points .500
berbs91 1- 0- 0 2 points 1.000
ambersuds 1- 0- 0 2 points 1.000
drshoen 1- 0- 0 2 points 1.000
Jeffrey On 1- 1- 0 2 points .500
lugnut92 1- 2- 0 2 points .333
NYhockeyguy 1- 2- 0 2 points .333
RPI92 1- 3- 0 2 points .250
redrocker 0- 0- 1 1 point .500
RKarger 0- 0- 1 1 point .500
Rockchops 0- 1- 1 1 point .250
vicb 0- 3- 1 1 point .125
RPI_2003 0- 1- 0 0 points .000
RenPI 0- 1- 0 0 points .000
johnk 0- 1- 0 0 points .000
Cookin4Fun 0- 1- 0 0 points .000
RPI-Fan-Go-Red 0- 1- 0 0 points .000
ZYanksRule 0- 1- 0 0 points .000
redhead18 0- 1- 0 0 points .000
Priceless 0- 1- 0 0 points .000
REDaero91 0- 1- 0 0 points .000
jmhusker 0- 2- 0 0 points .000
hawthr 0- 2- 0 0 points .000
RPI fan 4 life 0- 3- 0 0 points .000
Gophers #1 0- 3- 0 0 points .000
If Kazzie has a game like he had vs. Cornell we can win. If like the game against Colgate, we won't.Focus has to be on figuring out how to score. QU has shut down just about everyone. of course we have to deal with their top line but if we can hold this to a 1 goal game anything can happen. Kazzie has to both hot and near perfect but we have to find a way to put something into their net and we will have to do it with a number of injuries to top players. They outshoot just about everyone and seem to be especially tough in the third period. They get called for fewer penalties than the opponents and they score well on special teams. This is just not the kind of statistics that we match up well with. On paper a true David Vs. Goliath but perhaps SA can equip the team with a bunch of slings and stones.
IMHO a "pro hoc ergo propter hoc" fallacy. He has played well, but ...PUT ME IN COACH: The Engineers are 8-2-4 when freshman defenseman Tommy Grant is in the lineup and just 4-5-1 when he is scratched......[/url]
IMHO a "pro hoc ergo propter hoc" fallacy. He has played well, but ...
After seeing Quinnipiac a few times this year the one thing that seemed to bother them is real physical play. Clarkson really brought the physicality and Quinnipiac didn't seem to have much interest in returning it to the same level. They continued to try to use their speed and skill to work their way around the defense. Obviously this depends on how the refs want to call it tonight but a strong forecheck and finishing hits seemed to disrupt Q's timing and flow. Of course they had their chances still but it was nothing compared to when I saw them play Harvard or UConn when they were allowed to skate up the ice and into the zone seemingly at will.
IMHO a "pro hoc ergo propter hoc" fallacy. He has played well, but ...
And better music than we get at home!picture!