Amen.But whatever, it's in the past. First winning season for me, and here's to many more in the future!
End-of-season article by Ed Weaver in the Record http://www.troyrecord.com/articles/2010/03/10/sports/doc4b98780f1469b999854023.txt.
I like the fact that SA has seen the need to get bigger now that we have gotten more talented. I still believe in Newton's third law of motion(That Isaac was one heck of a hockey player)
I am sure that we don't know all of the players that SA is after, but the forwards that we know about are not that big. On the other hand, Curadi, Leboeuf, and Koudys all are quite Cornellian in height.
Ed Weaver said:It must be quickly added that the season was full of disappointments, capped off by the Engineers' dismal, preliminary-round loss to Brown, ECAC Hockey's worst team.
Indeed they are like buildings-but unless they switch to forward like Brutlag did this year-we will still be quite small up front. This year we were quite competitive but in some games it did appear our forwards were getting pushed around quite a bit. If it comes down to talent and speed versus size, of course I vote for talent, but to compete every game I just feel we need a bit more strength and size on the forward lines. I do agree however that York should feel a bit more comfortable next year knowing that the front of the net will be manned by some big boys.![]()
Of the three big defensemen, only Leboeuf is definitely arriving next season.
Pirri got shafted in the Rookie of the Year selection, in my opinion. They picked D'Amigo and Kinkaid (both expected) along with Harvard's franchise player, Leblanc. I watched both play online and I thought Pirri looked better.
Pirri got shafted in the Rookie of the Year selection, in my opinion. They picked D'Amigo and Kinkaid (both expected) along with Harvard's franchise player, Leblanc. I watched both play online and I thought Pirri looked better.