Thanks for all the information. The one thing that all of the simulations cannot take into consideration is how disorganized and confused we have looked at times. Same players out there, for the most part, but scrambled lines and defensive pairings. Some times it looks like after 25+ games we look like we have just started the season and no one is on the same page yet.
Question-RPI has an extremely long hockey history in Division I. Most consider the modern era as the past 65 years(roughly). Has any coach at RPI had more than 4 losing seasons other than SA? This will be his 9 season in Troy and this will be our 6th losing season. Other than Garry Kearns(who inherited just an impossible situation in 1965-66 and we had a 3-19 season) have even close to the winning percentage of the past 9 years? And although we play far more games now in a season than in the old days of coach Harkness, we will have had 4 seasons with 20 losses and only 1 season with 20 wins in our past 9 years. Success in the playoffs? Attending and ECAC final four? Memory fails me of those events. All of this in spite of 9 recruiting classes and years of graduations and turnover. With this much time passing and this many players coming and going, the only constant has been the coaching and the system in place.
I am certainly no hockey maven, but in medicine, when a treatment or therapy is not working, we have to make changes somewhere. Sometimes we switch to another medication, sometimes we increases dosages, and sometimes we call in another doctor to confer as a specialist. It just seems to me that after 9 years, the results speak for themselves.
Boring day here so I just thought i would stir up a bit of action and controversy.