What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI Hockey 2012-2013 Part III: There Will Be Math Involved

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: RPI Hockey 2012-2013 Part III: There Will Be Math Involved

That combo or adding Dumas into the mix will make for an uphill battle for us. I never thought I would yearn for the days of Pierre Belanger!

As much as I thought that the refs were lousy when I was at RPI, they seem to be getting worse. There are just too many refs who seem to want to be noticed and make an impact on the game. It just shouldn't be that way.
 
Last edited:
Re: RPI Hockey 2012-2013 Part III: There Will Be Math Involved

GAG
RPI Got A Goalie good job Seth! I know others on this sight, less enlighten ones think 3 goalies is a good thing. Good thing you don't coach.

Is this English?
 
Re: RPI Hockey 2012-2013 Part III: There Will Be Math Involved

Just listening to Schott on Fox Sports 980, there will be a shootout in case the game is tied after 65 minutes. :eek:
 
Re: RPI Hockey 2012-2013 Part III: There Will Be Math Involved

Just listening to Schott on Fox Sports 980, there will be a shootout in case the game is tied after 65 minutes. :eek:

darth-vader-no.jpg
 
Re: RPI Hockey 2012-2013 Part III: There Will Be Math Involved

Ahead of Saturday's big game in Albany, I chatted with Seth Appert. He talks about his team's improvement, Union's success vs RPI, some of his players who could be factors on Saturday night, and more.

To see what he had to say, go here: http://t.co/vzP2m6BY
 
Re: RPI Hockey 2012-2013 Part III: There Will Be Math Involved

Ahead of Saturday's big game in Albany, I chatted with Seth Appert. He talks about his team's improvement, Union's success vs RPI, some of his players who could be factors on Saturday night, and more.

To see what he had to say, go here: http://t.co/vzP2m6BY

He isn't saying anything. We have to read it. :D

Cool interview. Although I'm sure many of the RPI folk are used to the answers he gave, it's quite informative; you did a good job with this. :)
 
Re: RPI Hockey 2012-2013 Part III: There Will Be Math Involved

Isn't that exactly what rdf8585 wrote? "to see what he had to say" ?? :rolleyes:

How can you see what someone says, though? The last time I checked, Coach Appert doesn't use sign language, unless he's trying to explain a hockey intelligence quotient deficiency to one of the league's fine employees... ;)
 
Re: RPI Hockey 2012-2013 Part III: There Will Be Math Involved

How can you see what someone says, though? The last time I checked, Coach Appert doesn't use sign language, unless he's trying to explain a hockey intelligence quotient deficiency to one of the league's fine employees... ;)
Doesn't the written language allow one to "see" what was said?

Oh, never mind! :p
 
Re: RPI Hockey 2012-2013 Part III: There Will Be Math Involved

They're not saying anything there, either. Only a voice says something. ;)

The verb "to say" has both a literal and a figurative meaning.

RPI Hockey 2012-2013 Part IV: There Will Be Grammar Involved ;)
 
Re: RPI Hockey 2012-2013 Part III: There Will Be Math Involved

The verb "to say" has both a literal and a figurative meaning.

RPI Hockey 2012-2013 Part IV: There Will Be Grammar Involved ;)

And watch that thread have more math than this one. :p:D

Speaking of math, we could sure use some help from some of our previous opponents on Friday to make us a TUC.
 
Re: RPI Hockey 2012-2013 Part III: There Will Be Math Involved

I cannot believe I am reading some of this stuff.:confused: Or is it that i am just not following what i am seeing being said?:confused::confused:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top