What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI @ Cornell (Saturday, 25 February 2012)

Re: RPI @ Cornell (Saturday, 25 February 2012)

LynahScott said:
Or, you know, maybe RPI takes penalties, otherwise known as a demonstration of reality.
Click to expand...

RPI does take penalties; Cornell does too. That said, the calls and non-calls tonight have been interesting.
 
Re: RPI @ Cornell (Saturday, 25 February 2012)

Joe07 said:
RPI does take penalties; Cornell does too. That said, the calls and non-calls tonight have been interesting.
Click to expand...

If that's the word you want to use for it. Like that icing call right there-what was that?!
 
Re: RPI @ Cornell (Saturday, 25 February 2012)

Again, a non-icing gets called as an icing. Appert's scream could be heard by Cornell's announcers. They also said Appert's right - we won the race.
 
Re: RPI @ Cornell (Saturday, 25 February 2012)

Joe07 said:
Again, a non-icing gets called as an icing. Appert's scream could be heard by Cornell's announcers. They also said Appert's right - we won the race.
Click to expand...

All year icing calls have been a crap shoot. Seems random whether called, waived off . . .
 
Re: RPI @ Cornell (Saturday, 25 February 2012)

I'm kind of surprised they're not reviewing this. I stand corrected. They're reviewing it.
 
Re: RPI @ Cornell (Saturday, 25 February 2012)

DrDemento said:
Never should have changed the rule-can't give the officials more to decide about-they just cannot do it
Click to expand...

Why is it so hard to figure out "If the defending team leads the race at the faceoff dot, blow it dead. If the attacking team leads the race, don't blow it dead"?
 
Re: RPI @ Cornell (Saturday, 25 February 2012)

JCrawford said:
They needed to wait till the next whistle to stop play and review it.
Click to expand...

I realize that. I'm watching the video feed, though, and they initially weren't going to review it. After some discussion, they seemed to change their mind.
 
Re: RPI @ Cornell (Saturday, 25 February 2012)

GRussinko said:
Why is it so hard to figure out "If the defending team leads the race at the faceoff dot, blow it dead. If the attacking team leads the race, don't blow it dead"?
Click to expand...

These officials cannot even drop a puck properly-how can they be also expected to think and watch at the same time?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top