What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI at Yale, 2/19/2022

2021-22 Thread-Starting Statistics:

Code: 
Ralph Baer         6- 3- 2 12 points  .636
engineerhockeyfan  4- 7- 0  8 points  .364
DrDemento          2- 3- 1  5 points  .417
jericho            1- 1- 0  2 points  .500
sezenack           1- 1- 0  2 points  .500
fr joe             1- 3- 0  2 points  .250


Cumulative 2003-04 - 2021-22 Thread-Starting Statistics

Code: 
Ralph Baer        76-75-20 172 points  .503
fr joe            50-73-14 114 points  .416
engineerhockeyfan 42-63- 9  93 points  .408
DrDemento         15-29- 8  38 points  .365
Red Cloud         11- 3- 1  23 points  .767
hockeyhound       11-14- 1  23 points  .432
GRussinko         10-15- 2  22 points  .407
burgie12           6- 2- 1  13 points  .722
rpihockeyfan13     6- 6- 1  13 points  .500
Waite21            4- 9- 2  10 points  .333
jericho            5-17- 0  10 points  .227
RPIBMW             4- 5- 1   9 points  .450
FlagDUDE08         4- 0- 0   8 points 1.000
HighlanderRPI      3- 4- 1   7 points  .438
JCrawford          2- 1- 0   4 points  .667
REDRocket          2- 3- 0   4 points  .400
RPIHFH             1- 1- 1   3 points  .500
JennyRN            1- 1- 1   3 points  .500
fishcore12         0- 1- 3   3 points  .375
berbs91            1- 0- 0   2 points 1.000
ambersuds          1- 0- 0   2 points 1.000
drshoen            1- 0- 0   2 points 1.000
Jeffrey On         1- 1- 0   2 points  .500
sezenack           1- 1- 0   2 points  .500
ServinisScores     1- 2- 0   2 points  .333
lugnut92           1- 2- 0   2 points  .333
NYhockeyguy        1- 2- 0   2 points  .333
RPI92              1- 4- 0   2 points  .200
RKarger            0- 0- 1   1 point   .500
redrocker          0- 1- 1   1 point   .250
Rockchops          0- 1- 1   1 point   .250
vicb               0- 3- 1   1 point   .125
RPI_2003           0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
RenPI              0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
johnk              0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
Cookin4Fun         0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
RPI-Fan-Go-Red     0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
ZYanksRule         0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
redhead18          0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
Priceless          0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
REDaero91          0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
rsfs04             0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
jmhusker           0- 2- 0   0 points  .000
hawthr             0- 2- 0   0 points  .000
Gophers #1         0- 3- 0   0 points  .000
RPI fan 4 life     0- 5- 0   0 points  .000
 
Will not be here for the start of the game, but will join sometime around the second period.
We got a lot of help in the standings last night, now lets take advantage of that.

Lets go Red!!!!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
DrDemento said:
RB: I have some very old links to try but I doubt they would work. One is for an audio link and one is for a video - but the video link is extremely old and I only kept it to see that stunning female announcer they had for Yale back in the old days!! Adlon Adams.
https://media-exp1.licdn.com/dms/ima...oYi0EWXFX8IyYg
Click to expand...

Although I had forgotten, when you mentioned her name I certainly recalled her too. :-) What is the audio link?
 
Last edited:
The ECAC could become very interesting if we can beat Yale (which after seeing them in Troy is by no means a certainty) and we get some other help in the stands against Colgate and Cornell. A bye would certainly be the goal but 5th place would be almost as nice as we get home ice, the lowest seed to play and avoid QU and Clarkson in the second round giving us at least the best chance to go to Lake Placid that we might have.
 
sezenack said:
Let's get on a winning streak!
Click to expand...

Congratulations, sezenack, on your first-ever points in the thread-starting standings. I guess you only get two, even though the team got three.

If you're up to four after tonight's game, all the better.
 
Waite21 said:
Congratulations, sezenack, on your first-ever points in the thread-starting standings. I guess you only get two, even though the team got three.

If you're up to four after tonight's game, all the better.
Click to expand...

In order to be as close to what we have been doing all along, i decided to still award 2 points for a win in regulation or OT and 0 for a loss in regulation or OT. Any game going to a shootout would be regarded as a tie. I don't think that anyone stated that this should change this season. We promptly lost in overtime to BGSU in a thread which I started. I gave myself 0 points. If I had changed to the way things currently work that would not have been the case. Since this was an OOC game, I would have received a weird fraction of 3 points under current NCAA rules.

Comments?
 
Last edited:
Ralph Baer said:
In order to be as close to what we have been doing all along, i decided to still award 2 points for a win in regulation or OT and 0 for a loss in regulation or OT. Any game going to a shootout would be regarded as a tie. I don't think that anyone stated that this should change this season. We promptly lost in overtime to BGSU in a thread which I started. I gave myself 0 points. If I had changed to the way things currently work that would not have been the case. Since this was an OOC game, I would have received a weird fraction of 3 points under current NCAA rules.

Comments?
Click to expand...

i thought there would be no math? I hate the 3 on 3 OT and even more I detest the shootout. Hockey is a team game and should be decided as a team. I love the Stanley Cup format and could care less if it has to go 6 OT's all 5 on 5. One of the reasons i do not watch much soccer is the shootout at the ends of some games. For me it would be like decided the Super Bowl with Field Goal kicks from the 50 yard line. Or the World Series with a home run hitting contest. new rules do not always make a game better (some might).
You run the awarding of points in the scores thread so you decide what makes you comfortable and you think is fair.
 
RPI women, who will finish 10th in the ECAC, currently trailing 11th place Dartmouth 3-1 after 2 periods at HFH. If they lose this one they will have finished the season with 9 straight losses after a reasonably promising first half. Regardless of the outcome, the season is a step forward from a winless season, followed by a gameless season.
 
DrDemento said:
The ECAC could become very interesting if we can beat Yale (which after seeing them in Troy is by no means a certainty) and we get some other help in the stands against Colgate and Cornell. A bye would certainly be the goal but 5th place would be almost as nice as we get home ice, the lowest seed to play and avoid QU and Clarkson in the second round giving us at least the best chance to go to Lake Placid that we might have.
Click to expand...

We are going to have to play a lot better tonight. We only beat Brown, because they played worse than we did.
Even the awful Brown announcers noted the lack of energy in the entire game.
We need to be skating from the opening face off.
 
DrDemento said:
i thought there would be no math? I hate the 3 on 3 OT and even more I detest the shootout. Hockey is a team game and should be decided as a team. I love the Stanley Cup format and could care less if it has to go 6 OT's all 5 on 5. One of the reasons i do not watch much soccer is the shootout at the ends of some games. For me it would be like decided the Super Bowl with Field Goal kicks from the 50 yard line. Or the World Series with a home run hitting contest. new rules do not always make a game better (some might).
You run the awarding of points in the scores thread so you decide what makes you comfortable and you think is fair.
Click to expand...

Actually, I probably should abandon doing it completely because it causes people, including me, not to start threads on days when we are likely to lose. However, this year we often win the games we don't expect to win and vice versa.
 
engineerhockeyfan said:
We are going to have to play a lot better tonight. We only beat Brown, because they played worse than we did.
Even the awful Brown announcers noted the lack of energy in the entire game.
We need to be skating from the opening face off.
Click to expand...

Much of this year we have been involved in games like that. We win the ones that we play less bad than the opponent. We have had some really good games though - and even won a couple of them. But we have also played really well and lost. 55+ years of RPI hockey has taught me one thing - we are like a box of chocolates and you never know if we will be nougat, caramel, or creamy center. And sometimes we are just stale. But when we put it all together we are chocolate mousse and black forest cake put together!
Now I am getting a bit hungry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top