What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI at Harvard 2/18/23

2022-23 Thread-Starting Statistics:

Code: 
DrDemento          5- 3- 0 10 points  .625
sezenack           4- 3- 0  8 points  .571
jericho            2- 0- 0  4 points 1.000
RPI fan 4 life     1- 1- 0  2 points  .500
engineerhockeyfan  1- 5- 0  2 points  .167
Ralph Baer         0- 5- 1  1 point   .083
hab                0- 1- 0  0 points  .000
Waite21            0- 1- 0  0 points  .000



Cumulative 2003-04 - 2022-23 Thread-Starting Statistics

Code: 
Ralph Baer        78-81-21 177 points  .492
fr joe            50-74-14 114 points  .413
engineerhockeyfan 45-70- 9  99 points  .399
DrDemento         20-33- 8  48 points  .393
Red Cloud         11- 3- 1  23 points  .767
hockeyhound       11-14- 1  23 points  .432
GRussinko         10-15- 2  22 points  .407
jericho            7-17- 0  14 points  .292
burgie12           6- 2- 1  13 points  .722
rpihockeyfan13     6- 6- 1  13 points  .500
sezenack           5- 5- 0  10 points  .500
Waite21            4-10- 2  10 points  .312
RPIBMW             4- 5- 1   9 points  .450
FlagDUDE08         4- 0- 0   8 points 1.000
HighlanderRPI      3- 4- 1   7 points  .438
JCrawford          2- 1- 0   4 points  .667
REDRocket          2- 3- 0   4 points  .400
RPIHFH             1- 1- 1   3 points  .500
JennyRN            1- 1- 1   3 points  .500
fishcore12         0- 1- 3   3 points  .375
berbs91            1- 0- 0   2 points 1.000
ambersuds          1- 0- 0   2 points 1.000
drshoen            1- 0- 0   2 points 1.000
Jeffrey On         1- 1- 0   2 points  .500
ServinisScores     1- 2- 0   2 points  .333
lugnut92           1- 2- 0   2 points  .333
NYhockeyguy        1- 2- 0   2 points  .333
RPI92              1- 4- 0   2 points  .200
RPI fan 4 life     1- 6- 0   2 points  .143
RKarger            0- 0- 1   1 point   .500
redrocker          0- 1- 1   1 point   .250
Rockchops          0- 1- 1   1 point   .250
vicb               0- 3- 1   1 point   .125
RPI_2003           0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
RenPI              0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
johnk              0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
Cookin4Fun         0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
RPI-Fan-Go-Red     0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
ZYanksRule         0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
redhead18          0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
Priceless          0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
REDaero91          0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
rsfs04             0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
hab                0- 1- 0   0 points  .000
jmhusker           0- 2- 0   0 points  .000
hawthr             0- 2- 0   0 points  .000
Gophers #1         0- 3- 0   0 points  .000


For your listening pleasure:

Fight Song
http://pepband.union.rpi.edu/music/LongHail.mp3

Alma Mater
http://pepband.union.rpi.edu/music3/...ma%20Mater.mp3
 
DrDemento said:
Yes - but at least you remembered that you forgot.
Click to expand...

Part of the problem is that my memory is cluttered with things that are unimportant like "person, woman, man, camera, tv".

The fact that I recall the uniform numbers of RPI's hockey players from over 50 years ago means that there is no room for those playing now. Of course, if I paid for ESPN+, I might know them. :-)
 
Ralph Baer said:
Part of the problem is that my memory is cluttered with things that are unimportant like "person, woman, man, camera, tv".

The fact that I recall the uniform numbers of RPI's hockey players from over 50 years ago means that there is no room for those playing now. Of course, if I paid for ESPN+, I might know them. :-)
Click to expand...

Don't feel bad. I pay for EXPN+ (which has gotten much better since the first couple of weeks) and I still can't remember all the numbers.
We played Harvard tough in Troy, so they won't be taking us for granted tonight. Watson is going to have to steal one for us. No pressure.
 
engineerhockeyfan said:
Don't feel bad. I pay for EXPN+ (which has gotten much better since the first couple of weeks) and I still can't remember all the numbers.
We played Harvard tough in Troy, so they won't be taking us for granted tonight. Watson is going to have to steal one for us. No pressure.
Click to expand...

Watson was the best player on the ice last night. Dartmouth easily could have been up a few goals after 2. They need to take last night's 3rd period, feed off that, and come out strong. Tonight is all hands on deck effort.
 
vicious said:
Watson was the best player on the ice last night. Dartmouth easily could have been up a few goals after 2. They need to take last night's 3rd period, feed off that, and come out strong. Tonight is all hands on deck effort.
Click to expand...

"RPI hockey games are like a box of chocolates"
 
vicious said:
Watson was the best player on the ice last night. Dartmouth easily could have been up a few goals after 2. They need to take last night's 3rd period, feed off that, and come out strong. Tonight is all hands on deck effort.
Click to expand...

We often have all hands on deck, but no one in the batter's box. :-D
 
Three things we have to avoid tonight if we’re going to have a chance to win:
1. Get off to a decent start. Can’t afford to go down a couple of goals early to a team like Harvard.
2. Keep out of the penalty box. The more open ice there is, the more likely they will score.
3. Try to limit the number of shots taken. Dartmouth took over 65 shots last night.

And of course, avoid overtime. We saw what happened the first time we played them.
Do all that and we have a shot at a sweep. A lot to ask, but is possible. LGR!
 
For what it is worth, RPI is now riding a two-game road winning streak.

And for what it is worth, after the first time they played, the Harvard coach said RPI had a really good team.

The cockeyed optimist in me says it's time for our guys to reconfirm his analysis and extend their road winning streak to three.
 
RPI women trailing Colgate 1-0 after one period. Man, that Colgate team has some talent! Could be the team to beat, not just in ECAC but nationally (although they will have to solve the Yale goaltending). Rampado faced 20 shots.
 
RPI women now trailing #3 Colgate 2-1 after two periods. Shots are 42-9 for the Raiders, but Rampado is being Rampado again, and Wagner scored a great SH goal for the Engineers.
 
Last edited:
Ralph Baer said:
The women lost 6-1. SOGs were 65-12.
Click to expand...

If I heard correctly during the Senior Night celebration the women had a great day. They announced 10 seniors but several, including Rampado and Wagner will be returning to RPI for grad school next year. Assuming they will also play hockey, that's fantastic news. Hopefully the men (Mahshie?, Walsh?, Klee?, etc.) have similar luck bringing back contributors with remaining eligibility.
 
rpi82 said:
If I heard correctly during the Senior Night celebration the women had a great day. They announced 10 seniors but several, including Rampado and Wagner will be returning to RPI for grad school next year. Assuming they will also play hockey, that's fantastic news. Hopefully the men (Mahshie?, Walsh?, Klee?, etc.) have similar luck bringing back contributors with remaining eligibility.
Click to expand...

SOmewhere I read, probably on the women's thread a while ago, that some were entering the portal (Blitz?, Peterson?). I would think that the two whom you named would be more important.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top