What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI 2022-23: Return of the Schmidt and the Fans

I am not a fan of the 1 game and done format. One good game and you are in the quarter finals. How many times has a series split in the last few years? I would like to see some data on this.

Not quite as bad as it once was. After all, in this round all you are dealing with is a bunch of also rans. Really should not be using three nights just to get rid of four of them anyway.

Dumb was sometime in the 90's with top seed Harvard being taken out in a single game. Outright stupid was sometime in the early 70's with top seed UNH being taken out in a single game. The latter was a season ender as there were no back or side doors in to a four team NCAA in the 70's.

Guess who in both instances was the number eight seed that took them both out? The first time was the first time it ever happened.
 
I don't have any data, but my impression has been that the first round best-of-three series have tended not to attract very many fans, especially on the third night if it goes to three games.

Maybe somebody thinks that if the first round is one game, fans will show up for that one game.

I'm wondering whether the one game will be played on the first weekend in March, with the quarterfinals coming the following weekend, or whether the one game will be on Tuesday, Feb. 28 or Wednesday, Mar. 1, with the quarterfinals then being played Mar. 3-5. The College Hockey News article is silent on that point.

The official release shows it as a separate weekend. It also states that the women will have a 12-team playoff structure starting next season.
https://ecachockey.com/news/2022/11...nnounces-changes-to-postseason-structure.aspx
 
Last edited:
For RPI season ticket holders, this means an automatic refund for at least 2 games since we had to pay for 3 playoff games.
 
With the championship being decided with a one and done game, why bother having the lead up games be two out of three. It seems to me that it is backwards.
The championship should be a series, not the other way around. JMO
 
From an old time hockey fan - who always felt it was the best of the major sports. The more they have tinkered around with it, the more they have ruined it. Can imagine soon they will get rid of OT in the Stanley Cup and decide the winner with penalty kicks ( I mean shots) as they have in Soccer. What next, deciding the Baseball World Series with a home run derby? End the Super Bowl with alternating teams taking field goal kicks from midfield? here is my vote for old time hockey!
 
Last edited:
From an old time hockey fan - who always felt it was the best of the major sports. The more they have tinkered around with it, the more they have ruined it. Can imagine soon they will get rid of OT in the Stanley Cup and decide the winner with penalty kicks ( I mean shots) as they have it Soccer. What next, deciding the Baseball World Series with a home run derby? End the Super Bowl with alternating teams taking field goal kicks from midfield? here is my vote for old time hockey!

Amen
 
Blew a 2 goal lead for the second week in a row. The team played great hockey first 40 minutes then stopped playing in the 3rd? Can’t win many games playing like that especially against a team like Harvard with their 75 draft picks. Hands down our best players are muzzatti, evans, watson, smolinski. The rest of the team is pretty blah and not really a threat on the ice. Dr Schmidt was in the house which is great to see.
 
Harvard fan here. That was your game. Great performance and you guys controlled play and set the tempo. You will win a lot of games this year playing that brand of hockey and should have won tonight. Best of luck going forward!
 
Harvard fan here. That was your game. Great performance and you guys controlled play and set the tempo. You will win a lot of games this year playing that brand of hockey and should have won tonight. Best of luck going forward!

Thanks. We have trouble playing 60 (or more) minutes.
 
Just some observations on this weekends games.
The team defense in great. Everyone is involved and they take their opponents to the boards any time they try to rush from the wing.
The team offense is less than great. Most of our goals this year are going to be of the garbage variety.
PK is awesome.
PP is awful. I don't know if it is the talent on the ice or the coaching. They did change everything from Friday night and it still didn't work.
If we want to finish in the top four this year, we are going to have to make the PP work.
Oh, and the goalie is just great.
 
Just some observations on this weekends games.
The team defense in great. Everyone is involved and they take their opponents to the boards any time they try to rush from the wing.
The team offense is less than great. Most of our goals this year are going to be of the garbage variety.
PK is awesome.
PP is awful. I don't know if it is the talent on the ice or the coaching. They did change everything from Friday night and it still didn't work.
If we want to finish in the top four this year, we are going to have to make the PP work.
Oh, and the goalie is just great.

Agree on all points. We have not been a strong power play team for many seasons (with a couple exceptions). In fact, I have often posted during the score threads that we should decline a penalty! We might actually be even worse when up by two men since our weakness is magnified. On the other hand, I have seen other teams be very effective with the man advantage seemingly every year, regardless of personnel. What does that indicate? As you say, if we want to be top four, or in fact, even top six, we must make the special teams emphasized. Our PK has been very good and hopefully will continue. But if we cannot score with a man advantage, and definitely with a two man advantage, we will languish as a mid to lower level team. One other point, most of our games are true nail biters that often are one goal games with minutes to play. We must learn to shut teams down when they pull their goal tender for the extra attacker. We must score a number of empty net goals to seal the game quickly when the goalie is pulled. Finally, when we put that extra attacker out there, we have to learn how to keep the puck in the offensive zone and keep incessant pressure on for the entire time. Too often we pull the goalie, get the extra skater on the ice only to see the opponent clear the puck out of their zone immediately. All part of the fundamentals (like face offs) that we seem to not do as well as we should.
 
Agree on all points. We have not been a strong power play team for many seasons (with a couple exceptions). In fact, I have often posted during the score threads that we should decline a penalty! We might actually be even worse when up by two men since our weakness is magnified. On the other hand, I have seen other teams be very effective with the man advantage seemingly every year, regardless of personnel. What does that indicate? As you say, if we want to be top four, or in fact, even top six, we must make the special teams emphasized. Our PK has been very good and hopefully will continue. But if we cannot score with a man advantage, and definitely with a two man advantage, we will languish as a mid to lower level team. One other point, most of our games are true nail biters that often are one goal games with minutes to play. We must learn to shut teams down when they pull their goal tender for the extra attacker. We must score a number of empty net goals to seal the game quickly when the goalie is pulled. Finally, when we put that extra attacker out there, we have to learn how to keep the puck in the offensive zone and keep incessant pressure on for the entire time. Too often we pull the goalie, get the extra skater on the ice only to see the opponent clear the puck out of their zone immediately. All part of the fundamentals (like face offs) that we seem to not do as well as we should.

The WRPI announcers commented several times that Ciccarello was doing well on faceoffs. He was 9-2 yesterday. Perhaps he is a solution to one of our problems. Of course, it may be that Dartmouth wasn't any good either. Dartmouth also couldn't do anything with a 2-man advantage. Hmmm?!
 
Just some observations on this weekends games.
The team defense in great. Everyone is involved and they take their opponents to the boards any time they try to rush from the wing.
The team offense is less than great. Most of our goals this year are going to be of the garbage variety.
PK is awesome.
PP is awful. I don't know if it is the talent on the ice or the coaching. They did change everything from Friday night and it still didn't work.
If we want to finish in the top four this year, we are going to have to make the PP work.
Oh, and the goalie is just great.

Agree with most of this too.

Offense is definitely a concern. 6 games into the league schedule and we've scored a grand total of 8 goals in those 6 games. And in those games, we have not put up more than 2 against any opponent.

That said, some positives: nice response last night after Dartmouth went up 1-0. The team noticeably stepped it up and played with more energy and intensity. Watson turned in another very strong performance. And the PK is a definite strength. Killing the 3rd period 5x3 was the turning point in the game. And taking 4 of the 6 points on the weekend is good.

League opponents we've faced so far seem adept at taking away passing lanes, blocking shots, and just bottling up the offense. But the Harvard game was their best game to date. Play like that and we'll give anyone a run for their money. Harvard's speed and skill just overwhelmed with all the open ice in the 3x3 OT.
 
Football note- RPI has been selected to host a bowl game for this coming Saturday. They will play Morrisville State at 12 noon here at home in Troy. Well earned and the boys deserve this posting a 7-3 overall record with perhaps the best defensive effort for a season ever by an RPI team. With slightly better luck they could have easily been at least 9-1 and an NCAA III participant. All 3 of their losses were by only 3 points each!! I would imagine they will be listed as a slight favorite for this upcoming game.
 
Back
Top