Re: RPI 2017-18 Preseason Thread: To Dream the Impossible Dream
The letter published by the Poly seems quite clear. It says, in effect, the long-standing tradition of student control over the Union is null and void. We're hiring, firing and giving the orders now. So much for the value that students and alumni have placed on having an independent Union that provided a needed buffer against a school that prided itself on the rigors of its education (we got the old "look left, look right, one of you won't be here to graduate" speech).
I'm sure the generic "the president has supervisory powers over the institute" language has existed in the by-laws for many decades or more. You would think there'd be some sort of common law precedent established by the fact that the Union charter and by-laws have given students an enhanced level of control over that one function of the Institute for a similar period of time. in either case, this just seems like a stupid power grab that is unnecessary and indicative of a board that is both a puppet of the president and out of touch with the atmosphere on campus.
What a shocker... SAJ looks to take over the Union in a hostile manner again, and then tries to get the director of the board to tell us otherwise in a letter to alums. What a lying piece of scum.
The letter published by the Poly seems quite clear. It says, in effect, the long-standing tradition of student control over the Union is null and void. We're hiring, firing and giving the orders now. So much for the value that students and alumni have placed on having an independent Union that provided a needed buffer against a school that prided itself on the rigors of its education (we got the old "look left, look right, one of you won't be here to graduate" speech).
I'm sure the generic "the president has supervisory powers over the institute" language has existed in the by-laws for many decades or more. You would think there'd be some sort of common law precedent established by the fact that the Union charter and by-laws have given students an enhanced level of control over that one function of the Institute for a similar period of time. in either case, this just seems like a stupid power grab that is unnecessary and indicative of a board that is both a puppet of the president and out of touch with the atmosphere on campus.