After reading the series of articles in today's Schenectady Gazette, I can only conclude that this culture is not confined to the Union hockey team but is a statement of the college as a whole. Many of the writers and people interviewed for the articles/columns seemed to think that the behavior of the coach and Union players was perfectly fine and even justified. One went so far as to say that Appert should have gotten the same suspension as Bennett? Seriously? One writer cited it as a first offense (Bennett) and therefore the penalty was appropriate. How many times should you allow a coach to punch an opposing team's player before he is fired or at least given a lengthy suspension? Bodie says the reason he cross checked Higgs in the head is because he was coming at him. OK! That about says it all. So you have the coach acting like a complete mad man and the captain saying it's pretty much ok to cross check a player in the head if he is skating toward you. Never mind that Higgs was looking away at the time because the game was over, and the puck was safely in the corner.
They talked at length about the apologies. Are you kidding? Of course they apologized. They screwed up big time, and they feared for their jobs/careers/team.
As I said before, Union has been going after our players for years, particularly the high scoring ones, often leading to injuries. I realize good players get more attention from opposing teams, but Union plays about as dirty as they come.
I am not at all surprised that the ECAC found a way to give RPI as many penalties as they did and to let Union off as lightly as they did. What surprises me is that both Union and the ECAC don't seem to care about how bad this makes them look!