This is about right. I don't think anyone can have too much of a problem with the Fridgen era between 1994 when he took over and roughly 2001 or so, those were routinely good teams, many of which just barely missed out on going to the NCAAs. The 2001-02 team had a remarkable resurgence in January that produced a good end to what had been a tough year.
After that, I think the recruiting issues were becoming very noticeable, we were definitely losing battles for top level guys regularly. We got by for a few years on the talent of the very best guys on the team, but it was obvious after a while that the tide of the team was moving in the wrong direction.
Then Appert came in and pretty much burned the program to the ground with a purpose - to build it back up. It's evident in the struggles of the first three years of his direction that it wasn't going to be a matter of flipping a switch. But here we now stand, with three winning seasons in the last four, likely to become four in the last five. The trend is now upward. I don't think you can look at the 2004-05 Engineers and see a team that had a better than average shot at playing in the NCAAs. You look at this year's team, and next year's team, and I'm reasonably certain that you do. The preseason polls are indeed meaningless when the puck hits the ice, but people who know something about hockey had some high expectations for this team this season. Are they reaching those expectations? I don't think they are quite yet.
Yale had some pretty high expectations last year and they were in a pretty rough spot during the regular season, too.