What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

AspyDad said:
I agree with all this. I especially like the Josh/JL/Cullen line that we have seen the last couple of games.
Click to expand...
I disagree, I just don't see this line clicking at all, and don't believe it is good for the development of JL.
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

Tuesday's game was brutal to watch, talk about being lost, with the exception of about the first 8 minutes Union beat us to the puck all nite long and were using Merriam for target practice. As far as York leaving early, I really don't see it as an issue I sincerely doubt our record would be any better had he still been here, goaltending is not an issue. Someone mentioned this is somewhat of a rebuilding year but I'm trying to find when we peaked...it must have been last year. One must remember we are 6 years into the SA era (and I like the guy) and many years worth of great recruiting so what is going on that we struggle so and have to call this a rebuilding year?
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

Big Jim said:
Tuesday's game was brutal to watch, talk about being lost, with the exception of about the first 8 minutes Union beat us to the puck all nite long and were using Merriam for target practice. As far as York leaving early, I really don't see it as an issue I sincerely doubt our record would be any better had he still been here, goaltending is not an issue. Someone mentioned this is somewhat of a rebuilding year but I'm trying to find when we peaked...it must have been last year. One must remember we are 6 years into the SA era (and I like the guy) and many years worth of great recruiting so what is going on that we struggle so and have to call this a rebuilding year?
Click to expand...

You had me up until "I like the guy." We know that's not true.

If this is indeed a rebuilding year, it doesn't take a genius (or in this case, maybe it does) to realize that reaching the NCAA tournament may have been a local peak.

For my money, it isn't a rebuilding year. But you need your strawman I suppose.
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

Here is a list of random things, arranged with things I like the most at the top, and completely despise at the bottom.

RPI wins :D :D :D
Puckman :D
Thoughtful discussions about RPI hockey or college hockey in general :o
Double rainbows :p
RPI losses :mad:
Getting trolled by Hockey East db's :mad: :mad:
Latin, French, or any discussion of grammatical structure in an RPI thread :mad: :mad: :mad:
"I was told there would be no ______" :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

Timmah! said:
Here is a list of random things, arranged with things I like the most at the top, and completely despise at the bottom.

RPI wins :D :D :D
Puckman :D
Thoughtful discussions about RPI hockey or college hockey in general :o
Double rainbows :p
RPI losses :mad:
Getting trolled by Hockey East db's :mad: :mad:
Latin, French, or any discussion of grammatical structure in an RPI thread :mad: :mad: :mad:
"I was told there would be no ______" :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
Click to expand...

Seeing as how thoughtful discussions about college hockey embarrass you... ;)
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

Timmah! said:
Here is a list of random things, arranged with things I like the most at the top, and completely despise at the bottom.

RPI wins :D :D :D
Puckman :D
Thoughtful discussions about RPI hockey or college hockey in general :o
Double rainbows :p
RPI losses :mad:
Getting trolled by Hockey East db's :mad: :mad:
Latin, French, or any discussion of grammatical structure in an RPI thread :mad: :mad: :mad:
"I was told there would be no ______" :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
Click to expand...

I like long walks in the park.
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

Timmah! said:
Here is a list of random things, arranged with things I like the most at the top, and completely despise at the bottom.

RPI wins :D :D :D
Puckman :D
Thoughtful discussions about RPI hockey or college hockey in general :o
Double rainbows :p
RPI losses :mad:
Getting trolled by Hockey East db's :mad: :mad:
Latin, French, or any discussion of grammatical structure in an RPI thread :mad: :mad: :mad:
"I was told there would be no ______" :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
Click to expand...

How 'bout tailgating...?:o
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

Red Cloud said:
Yeah, the guy that talks about hockey. You must be the other guy.
Click to expand...

Why even bother presenting opinions about hockey when they're going to be taken out of context and blasted? (not necessarily by you, mostly by others, but I'm sure you get my drift)

I already presented my position. I've heard opinions about it. Do you expect us to try to do drag out 10 days of bye time like we were Super Bowl pregame presenters?
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

FlagDUDE08 said:
Why even bother presenting opinions about hockey when they're going to be taken out of context and blasted? (not necessarily by you, mostly by others, but I'm sure you get my drift)

I already presented my position. I've heard opinions about it. Do you expect us to try to do drag out 10 days of bye time like we were Super Bowl pregame presenters?
Click to expand...

You don't like it? Leave.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top