Re: RPI 2010-2011 V: The "Chase" to AC & Beyond
I'm not entirely surprised. If CC keeps winning, our RPI keeps moving up. I'm a little surprised that it's as important as it is, but they are the only team that we've played twice that isn't playing someone else that we've also played twice. I think it's the dual nature of the Cornell / Dartmouth game that keeps that game from being as important as I expected.Surprisingly, my program seems to indicate that the outcome of the CC / UND game is the most important game for us tomorrow, and that we want CC to win. I was quite taken aback when it suggested that. Looking at the data a bit more, it seems that the CC comparison is a lost cause and that a UND win causes UNO to rise past us in the rankings. I sent the data off to Tom; I'm hoping he has a better idea why it would suggest this.
The 2nd most important game, according to the program, is Miami vs. Notre Dame, where we want a Miami victory. That one makes a lot more sense to me, as we still have a shot of flipping the Notre Dame comparison. 3rd most important is Merrimack vs. New Hampshire, where we want a Merrimack victory. 4th is Michigan vs. Western Michigan, where we want Michigan. The rest we're mostly indifferent toward, according to the program -- no single result has a large impact either way in the other 6 games.
I figured that it was that or something similar. It was the UConn situation where they had three possible placements which clearly added up to 95% which drew my attention to it. I was just curious as to the methodology.Ah, I was hoping no one would catch that. I added auto-bids to the "in tournament" section using a custom case but didn't subtract them from the "out of tournament". I figured it wasn't a big deal as that section isn't as important as the "in tournament" section.