Geez, man, do you enjoy going into two different threads and being ridiculously negative?
Powers &8^]
It's a measure of expectations, if nothing else. Should we consider a win against Michigan no more impressive than a win against, say, Army?
Powers &8^]
It was stated going into the series that these two goalies would split time.So, RIT- any idea why the goalies were changed? I know the goals were not his fault, but last night he was pretty hot.
I think Maine might have an argument hereAlso, Niagara lost the opener in OT, then won the next night.
Yes, it was tied late, thought it ended that way.
But I also know a certain #1 ranked team that lost to Michigan at Yost in the regionals the season before (spring, 1998.) Is that better?
Hmm...can't remember.![]()
Also, North Dakota was a #2 seed that year.![]()
So, RIT- any idea why the goalies were changed? I know the goals were not his fault, but last night he was pretty hot. Anyway, Michigan buried more chances tonight, and just too big a hill to climb. You guys are good- and have a great season.