Potw Procedural Amendments

[CARDS_rule_the_Burgh]

So, before I make any changes to the Player of the Week Procedures, I want to know what changes you all support. This poll is public, because the same issues that the POTW process faces could taint the results of this poll.

The integrity of the Player of the Week title should always come before homer-ism.

 

[CARDS_rule_the_Burgh]

Re: Potw Procedural Amendments

I suppose I should note that for choice #5, I would of course not eliminate anybody truly deserving.

If 6 or 7 players all had equally amazing weekends, those 6 or 7 would get in.
If 4 players stood out, and then there was a bunch "on the edge", 4 would be in.

I just realized that the way I worded it sounded like a way to keep those who deserve it out of the competition, based on bias.

 

[norm1909]

Re: Potw Procedural Amendments

I suppose I should note that for choice #5, I would of course not eliminate anybody truly deserving.

If 6 or 7 players all had equally amazing weekends, those 6 or 7 would get in.
If 4 players stood out, and then there was a bunch "on the edge", 4 would be in.

I just realized that the way I worded it sounded like a way to keep those who deserve it out of the competition, based on bias.

You noted "Must provide rationale", that should be enough to keep you honest

 

[17'sfanNU]

Re: Potw Procedural Amendments

I trust your decisions, Cards. Nobody else in their right mind would undertake a task this large! Thanks for your efforts.

 

[Foreright1613]

Re: Potw Procedural Amendments

I'm with you as long as you don't declare any polls null & void.