Re: POTUS 45.7 - Has the left reached the acceptance stage yet?
Question for you: how is Germany not paying for other people's labor (i.e. Defense) different than Trump not paying for other people's labor on his casinos?
Not sure about the relevance of that analogy but I assume you're intimating Trump is a crook for doing so. But then Germany is just fine?
Well you have to remember, since the wall fell, the urgency of defense spending throughout NATO countries has diminished until recently. So its hard to find fault with the Germans or anyone else for not spending as much. Now that the need is there, all of these governments are going to increase their spending, and sure, they could spend more and raise it more quickly. But even Sweden is doing stuff. They just started a draft.
Some are increasing, some not so much. Italy is going down, Poland is way up. Sweden probably should do something, it's not a NATO member.
Because he is handling this like a child. This isn't being rude, it's being tactless and it shows a complete lack of negotiating skills.
I can't believe you guys are falling for this kind of drivel.
Bush cajoled, Obama charmed. It got them nowhere.
In the words of that immortal philosopher, Eric 'Otter' Stratton, "I think this situation absolutely requires... a really... futile... and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part!"
That's not really
how NATO funding works. It's not some kind of payment; it's a NATO guideline for how much of their GDP member countries should spend on their own national defense.
Nobody is misunderstanding how NATO funding works. In 2002, Germany was spending 1.5% GDP or about $50 billion on defense. At that time the Chancelor committed to making that 2% GDP. Instead they spent less and less and last year Germany spent 1.2% GDP or about $39.6 billion. Now Germany's readiness by all accounts is very poor. If Euros had spent 2% all along, which was the guideline, perhaps Putin would have thought twice about rolling into the Ukraine. And maybe the Euros wouldn't have to look at us and say" Are you guys going to do something about this?"
NATO's main mission the last several years has been fighting terrorism in Afghanistan. I find it hard to swallow that the availability of another $500 billion in equipment and personnel that members were supposed to have invested in couldn't have made that a far easier road for all. Or make all of Europe more secure.
If Putin gets up on the wrong side of the bed one day, decides he wants the Baltics back and rolls into Latvia, NATO is 100% committed. And who's men and materiel will be at the forefront of that effort?
The United States, because we are the only ones prepared. That's a stupid situation, if you ask me.