Trump just called Paul Ryan 'Ron' twice in a speech in Wisconsin. Guy is losing it.
Anybody followed Alex Jones' child custody case at all?
Judge Orlinda Naranjo debated which videos were admissible, disallowing one in which an apparently drunk Alex Jones said “1776 will commence again,” arguing that the statement had political overtones.
She said it was unclear what he meant by “the age of man will commence,” and no one on either legal team could help. The judge allowed it anyway.
Other clips included one in which Alex said “I can drink a whole jug of Jack Daniels and not even show it,” a clip which attorney Wilhite said was “taken out of context”.
At least he didn't call him Rex.
Don't ever tell me alcoholism isn't funny. I'm crying at this: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...-trial.html?via=newsletter&source=DDAfternoon
Does anyone else find it absurd there is a jury trial to decide a child custody case? Is this normal anywhere other than Texas?
Does anyone else find it absurd there is a jury trial to decide a child custody case? Is this normal anywhere other than Texas?
I'm st the point where I just don't click simply to make sure that Jones doesn't get the views.
If you do click, make sure to skip the ad as soon as possible, as according to CGP Grey, that's one way to make sure that nobody gets paid: https://youtu.be/KW0eUrUiyxo
Steve KingVerified account @SteveKingIA
First non-valedictorian DREAMer deported. Border Patrol, this one's for you. http://usat.ly/2pyZriQ
Suckers.
Actually, no. This is exactly what those racist f-cks wanted.
I thought "suckers" was referring to the equivalency crowd?
No, "suckers" is for the Trump voters who thought they were getting something new on banksters, China, global policeman, etc.
The swamp is getting to this administration. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLcVJin-TA
Brent, my question was poorly phrased. I guess what I meant was I find it odd that in Texas they have a jury, instead of a judge, decide issues of custody. I was under the impression it was handled, like in your case, by a judge making the decision.I actually don't. I was told by my lawyer, that even if my ex stated that she didn't want child support money, and wouldn't argue any custody claim (we had come to a gentleman's agreement), the judge could overrule, and dictate custody and child support. To me, that's bullsh*. I had to legally cede all custody/etc to my ex, to legally satisfy the conditions of our agreement. Otherwise, one or both of us could be majorly screwed.
I've always assumed people like Limbaugh, Jones and all the rest have taken inspiration from the character Barry Champlain from Talk Radio, and understand that it really doesn't matter what you say or whether you are believable or not, its just a matter of pushing the right buttons to get the audience.Yeah, I just never click his YouTube "news" sources, stopped after the third time he posted one of those, give or take. Also, given that Jones said he's been lying to his viewers the whole time, how can he possibly still have an audience? It's like they just want the delusion.
I've always assumed people like Limbaugh, Jones and all the rest have taken inspiration from the character Barry Champlain from Talk Radio, and understand that it really doesn't matter what you say or whether you are believable or not, its just a matter of pushing the right buttons to get the audience.