D
Deutsche Gopher Fan
Guest
"many have denounced"? It's a fact.
Was this from the Times?
Not quite. The hill
"many have denounced"? It's a fact.
Was this from the Times?
Yes. He was also initially anonymous but was sniffed out.
I didn't know this before doing some research but apparently American whistle-blowing really got its institutional support during the Civil War with an effort by Lincoln to empower civilians to rat out war supply profiteers. It was in fact called "Lincoln's Law" for a long time, and it remained very strong and substantially the same until defense contractors exercised their First Amendment Rights by lobbying to weaken it during the middle of the 20th Century.
Plus ca change, plus ca meme chose. The worm in the apple has always been the same.
D'ya ever get the feeling it's always been just the same 500 or so families? I mean whether it's slaves or banks or oil or weapons or data, that it's always been the same handful of as-sholes. No common characteristics -- nothing demographic, not even their politics. Just their money. That they themselves aren't really in control, but are just disease-bearing vectors, and that at the bottom of all the trouble is simply the money. Like blood, money needs to circulate, and like blood when too much of it collects in one place it leads to necrosis.
There's money to be made as a president holding global conventions at his own properties, also.
Somehow, you never bother to post your scathing commentary about stuff like that.
Whatever my comments are, I doubt they rise to the level of "scathing commentary," but we'll just have to agree to disagree.
My response to Scooby was simply this. I think it's silly to think that Trump's crazy tweet rants are going to force future whistleblowers to reconsider their actions. Others may disagree. That's fine. It's just my opinion.
That wasn't his point. His point was Trump's crazy tweet rants are gonna have half this country thinking whistleblowers are the lowest of the low garden variety scum whose information is at best meaningless, and at worst a criminal act. Therefore, not to be believed, about anything. Therefore, anything brought to public attention by whistleblowers is de facto without merit.
As he's convinced half the country about most everything that happens these days, the media, politicians of opposing parties, in short, anyone who doesn't worship and pay divine tribute at the altar of Trump. .
I think you give him too much credit. People may be persuaded to question the whistleblower's accuracy, his or her motives and his or her personal knowledge of the events, but at the end of the day I think most people's perception of the whistleblower will ultimately be determined by how much of the story is corroborated.
I think you give him too much credit. People may be persuaded to question the whistleblower's accuracy, his or her motives and his or her personal knowledge of the events, but at the end of the day I think most people's perception of the whistleblower will ultimately be determined by how much of the story is corroborated.
Have you been sleeping the last four years? The last 30?
What's people's opinion of Hillary Clinton? How do you suppose those opinions got formed? And don't bother with some high-browed "I think" answer. You know damm well how that happened.
Now we're building a wall in Colorado, apparently.
https://www.9news.com/article/news/...Wrodm6Sac3-armZSsnqoEQDB9WTvjbz07FE6L0xvlb4Fw
Hearings will be public, after the pertinent information is gathered. You don't have witnesses to crimes testifying where other witnesses to the same crime can see what they have said, and modify their story to match.
Well, yeah. Gotta keep them NEW Mexicans out too, not just the old ones...
Now we're building a wall in Colorado, apparently.
https://www.9news.com/article/news/...Wrodm6Sac3-armZSsnqoEQDB9WTvjbz07FE6L0xvlb4Fw
One of Sniffles' lawyers argued in court today that he could literally commit murder and there isn't anything that could be done. That he is above the law.
I'd say he has a pre-1215 mentality, but he probably has no idea what relevance that date holds. Or he'd think it was lunchtime.
D or R. Or I. Or Whig. Or whatever.
The. President. IS. NOT. Above. The. Law.
Why is it so difficult for the Republicans to grasp this concept?
They do grasp the concept. They disagree with it.
Currently disagree with it