Nunnes is being his normal d-uchebag self.
They covered this up immediately. There was an immediate recognition this could be impeachable.
White House lawyers tried to scrub the phone call and transcripts from the record. They tried to classify it despite it not having classified info.
They covered it up.
road sign reads....
road signs don't speak![]()
What the **** is Nunes doing??!
You think they use "inter alia" a lot?
fFS According to multiple White House officials I spoke with, the transcript of the President's call with President Zelenskyy was placed into a computer system managed directly by the National Security Council (NSC) Directorate for Intelligence Programs. This is a standalone computer system reserved for codeword-level intelligence information , such as covert action. According to information I received from White House officials, some officials voiced concerns internally that this would be an abuse of the system and was not consistent with the responsibilities of the Directorate for Intelligence Programs. According to White House officials I spoke with, this was "not the first time" under this Administration that a Presidential transcript was placed into this codeword-level system solely for the purpose of protecting politically sensitive-rather than national security sensitive-information.
HOly ****. Directly from the whistleblower report:
This is so bad...
Letter from the ICIG
Whistleblower Complaint
Almost like using a private server?
Here we go
BREAKING: The whistleblower complaint at the center of a brewing controversy involving President Trump reportedly accuses White House officials of moving records on some of Trump's contacts with foreign officials, including Trump's call with the Ukrainian president, onto a separate computer network as part of a pattern of obfuscation.
HOly ****. Directly from the whistleblower report
Exactly. Like Watergate, even if you can get away with the crime, it's the cover up that gets you.
Keep it up, NYT.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">No, the New York Times did not talk to six “swing voters” about impeachment. The article quotes a handful of devout GOP voters who the NYT has repeatedly interviewed multiple times. A thread.... <a href="https://t.co/QYKCWB9V5I">https://t.co/QYKCWB9V5I</a></p>— Matt McDermott (@mattmfm) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattmfm/status/1177175443335766016?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 26, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
It also appears that the whistleblower law needs to be clarified so this never happens again.