What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.58: Admit it, those lights are making you look orange too.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
Ok. Same question, what are they trying to do?
Click to expand...

Trying to get other countries to cooperate in debunking the origins of the Russia investigation. Namely, that it wasn't Russia that hacked the DNC, that it wasn't Russia conspiring with the Trump campaign, that it was the Ukraine working with Hillary and the Deep State to conspire against Trump.

This whole Trump/Ukraine/Biden thing began from Trump wanting to dig up info that cleared Manafort, that the Ukraine was giving info to Hillary to implicate Manafort.

As I've been constantly saying, its all projection with this crew.
 
Handyman said:
Michigan voting totals:

2012 - 4,679,825 (Obama took 54%)
2016 - 4,548,382 (Trump too 47.5% Clinton 42.27%)

That is a difference of 131,443. Now that is a rather small number obviously and in any other election would not be a noticeable or a concerning dip EXCEPT those people not voting is the difference in who won. Trump won the state by just over 10k votes. Now you could argue some Righties stayed home, but seeing as Trump got more votes in the state than Romney did (and McCain before him) that doesnt seem likely. So that means either the Dem voters didnt vote or went third party. (Stein got 51k votes...how the heck is that even possible) Hell just check articles in Michigan papers from the time...it was about how the Dems in Michigan didnt turn out. (or you have to admit some voters flipped completely which I know happened in Minnesota)

Now you are right, they (and others) hated Clinton. Hell it is why you and I hated having to vote for her. Difference is we still did. And I know Hillary got more than enough votes to win and I know there were other factors at play that have zero to do with the candidates (and everything to do with screwing people out of voting) and I know her strategy was so stupid a 5 year old could pick it apart...but she still could have won if they Dems in the major metro areas had turned out like they did for Obama.
Click to expand...

Yup. My dad voted for Gary Johnson, and defended it with "butter emails" the day afterward.
 
Re: POTUS 45.58: Admit it, those lights are making you look orange too.

FadeToBlack&Gold said:
Libs? Nah, but plenty of (((Centrist Warmongers))). ;)
Click to expand...

Wait...do we the Loyal Order of Warmongering Conservadems need to adopt the WSJ as one of our mainstay periodicals? Might need to discuss this at the next Lodge Meeting ;)
 
Re: POTUS 45.58: Admit it, those lights are making you look orange too.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Mid-July 2019: <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> halts military aid to Ukraine<br><br>July 25, 2019: Right after Ukranian leader raises military aid issue, <a href="https://twitter.com/POTUS?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@POTUS</a> says "I would like you to do us a favor though..." One of the favors is to investigate Biden.<br><br>This is why public sentiment is moving. <a href="https://t.co/3V5bZrfxoZ">https://t.co/3V5bZrfxoZ</a></p>— Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) <a href="https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1178909091978080256?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Ted Lieu and Adam Schiff are gonna save this country...
 
Re: POTUS 45.58: Admit it, those lights are making you look orange too.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Now Hannity and <a href="https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@LindseyGrahamSC</a> are speculating that foreign countries contracted spies to help the Democrats take down Trump.<br><br>A global conspiracy against Trump in 2016 that led to...his election as president!</p>— Jon Favreau (@jonfavs) <a href="https://twitter.com/jonfavs/status/1178846441780834306?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.58: Admit it, those lights are making you look orange too.

Handyman said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Now Hannity and <a href="https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@LindseyGrahamSC</a> are speculating that foreign countries contracted spies to help the Democrats take down Trump.<br><br>A global conspiracy against Trump in 2016 that led to...his election as president!</p>— Jon Favreau (@jonfavs) <a href="https://twitter.com/jonfavs/status/1178846441780834306?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...

That's just how popular he truly is. He was able to overcome not only millions of illegal immigrants voting against him, but a VAST <strike>WCHA</strike> DNC CONSPIRACY as well...
 
Re: POTUS 45.58: Admit it, those lights are making you look orange too.

NYT and Bret Stephens are the gift that keep on giving

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Dear NYT — Prager U is a scam. Having a featured columnist associated with it is an embarassment. <a href="https://t.co/6oIdPPV2qZ">https://t.co/6oIdPPV2qZ</a></p>— Charles P. Pierce (@CharlesPPierce) <a href="https://twitter.com/CharlesPPierce/status/1178844586405441537?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.58: Admit it, those lights are making you look orange too.

Come on.

We all know that the FISA warrant was obtained illegally. That the dossier is a complete fabrication. And, that Hunter Biden got a lot of money from a lot of rich people the wrong way and the Trump's got it all the right way. Barr's doing the right thing investigating why Trump was investigated. Lindsey is on the right track. And, this President certainly hasn't done anything wrong. Oh, and we all know that Hillary's Server is in the Ukraine. Come on, DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Re: POTUS 45.58: Admit it, those lights are making you look orange too.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Why isn’t Congressman Adam Schiff being brought up on charges for fraudulently making up a statement and reading it to Congress as if this statement, which was very dishonest and bad for me, was directly made by the President of the United States? This should never be allowed!</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1179048439319072768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I have to agree. Schiff should be locked up for paraphrasing the President. Lying is always ok by the Executive Branch. But Paraphrasing the Executive by the Legislative Branch is criminal. There can be no question about that.
 
Re: POTUS 45.58: Admit it, those lights are making you look orange too.

ScoobyDoo said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Why isn’t Congressman Adam Schiff being brought up on charges for fraudulently making up a statement and reading it to Congress as if this statement, which was very dishonest and bad for me, was directly made by the President of the United States? This should never be allowed!</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1179048439319072768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I have to agree. Schiff should be locked up for paraphrasing the President. Lying is always ok by the Executive Branch. But Paraphrasing the Executive by the Legislative Branch is criminal. There can be no question about that.
Click to expand...

I don't know how many of Reagan's handlers are left from his 2nd term, but when Ronbo started going senile his people did an excellent job of hiding it from the American people with only Kitty Kelly touching on the subject in a widely panned book about the First Lady that turned out to be more accurate about his dementia than anything the Beltway Media produced back then. :eek: Might be time for someone in the GOP to give them a call to help in keeping Chump's rapid descent into insanity under wraps at least until his impeachment trail is over. :D
 
Re: POTUS 45.58: Admit it, those lights are making you look orange too.

Our institutions are gonna save us, right?

“BREAKING: Secretary of State Mike Pompeo blistered Democrats in a new statement, accusing them of trying "to intimidate" and "bully" by issuing a subpoena for witness testimony and documents relating to an impeachment inquiry over President Trump's call with Ukraine, and said his officials will not appear for scheduled depositions.”
 
Re: POTUS 45.58: Admit it, those lights are making you look orange too.

D'oh! Why didnt the Dems think of all these roadblocks during the Clinton impeachment?!
 
Re: POTUS 45.58: Admit it, those lights are making you look orange too.

They arent making themselves look more guilty...AT ALL!

Keep it up Dems! If they think this is bullying they aint seen nothing yet :D

Trump is hitting Nixon levels of paranoia and craziness...keep him on tilt you have no idea what it might cause him to do :D
 
Re: POTUS 45.58: Admit it, those lights are making you look orange too.

Is there any way to expedite these judicial rulings that are going to be required straight up to the SCOTUS? Who has jurisdiction in these cases anyway?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top