Rich people use their money.
From today's WaPo Post Partisan
No, they don't. If they did, they wouldn't be rich anymore.
A poor person spends nearly 100% of their income just to live. A rich person spends a fraction on living expenses, an additional fraction on luxuries, and invests the rest (and pays a lower tax rate on that investment to boot).
Alfa
Rich people use their money. They just don't use on the things most ordinary folks do.
And they do need their money to (a) give it away and/or (b) maintain their lifestyle of the rich and famous.
You forgot the most important part: Investing in power and control.
You forgot the most important part: Investing in power and control.
So, how much do we hear about the caravan, and troop deployments, in the next few months?
The Golden Rule: those with the gold make the rules.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">If the Democrats think they are going to waste Taxpayer Money investigating us at the House level, then we will likewise be forced to consider investigating them for all of the leaks of Classified Information, and much else, at the Senate level. Two can play that game!</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1060155917059219461?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 7, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Alfa
Rich people use their money. They just don't use on the things most ordinary folks do.
And they do need their money to (a) give it away and/or (b) maintain their lifestyle of the rich and famous.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">According to NBC News, Voters Nationwide Disapprove of the so-called Mueller Investigation (46%) more than they Approve (41%). You mean they are finally beginning to understand what a disgusting Witch Hunt, led by 17 Angry Democrats, is all about!</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1060194964351660033?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 7, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Press Conference should be fun. Turtle Boy is taking his victory lap. Trump will take his. And Nancy will talk about bipartisanship.
Using /= Spending. It also includes savings and investments (often one and the same).
That said, joe is still stretching. He's making Stretch Armstrong blush.
Alfa
Rich people use their money. They just don't use on the things most ordinary folks do.
And they do need their money to (a) give it away and/or (b) maintain their lifestyle of the rich and famous.
They may use some money, but they don't use it nearly in the same way as everyone else does.
Yes, they spend to be "rich and famous", but data clearly shows that they also save in a MUCH higher proportion than poor people do. Which is to say, a $100M tax cut spread among 100,000 people who scrape by vs 10 people who don't will have very, very different effects on the economy- one will cycle almost all $100M right through the economy- and that will repeat many times over as the places they spend their money also has a low savings rate, whereas the other- when you a rich, the average savings is about 20%, so $20M is taken off right off the top. And that effect keeps going as they spend.
*Some* give it away. Not nearly enough.
Taxes should be a zero sum game- the money you collect in taxes are just re-run through different consumers. But the current tax cut has been anything but that- when you see how many dollars were put into corporate savings by stock buy back- that just took those billions of dollars completely out of the economy.
At some point, joe, you should go look at the actual data, of taxes, tax rates, and how much money people save. You would quickly find out that $1B on welfare for those who don't work will work it's way through the economy many times over, whereas the same for rich people who save money has a much less effect. It's not rocket science. It's just basic math.
No, joe, they don't. Not at the relative levels those who make less than them do.