What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

The Sicatoka said:
Dunham. Clooney. Sarandon. <-- circular firing squad lining up in Hollywood? ;) :D
Click to expand...

What did Dunham do?

And hey, if you want your own triumverate of losers, you can have King. Chaffetz. Sessions. So what's worse, having rich supporters who are idiots, or having elected officials who are idiots?
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

ScoobyDoo said:
Well, the delusion goes further. From what I see all around me the Democrats are already getting blamed for screwing up this Presidency. Mitch goes out and says the Dems are delaying things they can't delay (they have zero power beyond the filibuster which as far as I can see they haven't really used yet) and it's being bought, hook, line, and sinker.
Click to expand...

Like I've said, the Rs are the "opposition party". Great back seat drivers. Don't be surprised when you see Mitch behind the wheel here.
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

rufus said:
As so many of the righties are so fond of telling us, the US ain't Europe. Why you go looking to them for examples of how we should do things, I don't understand. Socialist.
Click to expand...

I thought were were supposed to be more like the Euros. Except when we shouldn't, I guess.
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

The Sicatoka said:
Like I've said, the Rs are the "opposition party". Great back seat drivers. Don't be surprised when you see Mitch behind the wheel here.
Click to expand...

I heard a rumor that if they're in power they actually will have to govern. I heard stuff on Morning Joe this morning about how many GOP lawmakers are upset that the President is not allowing the media to talk about policy because of all the drama.

But, they did have time to pass a law eliminating the only gun law the last administration was able to pass. So, now mental patients have more access to their 2nd amendment rights.

This of course will increase the GOP's ability to get people to vote for them.
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

aparch said:
Oh no! By teasing the announcement, bad hombres have a window in which they can pour into the US like clowns from a Chrysler K-Car!!
Click to expand...

Yeah. you never announce what your strategy is gonna be. that lets the bad guys know, so they'll figure a way around it. Right?

Anyway, that's what SCROTUS told us on the campaign trail.
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

Kepler said:
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzing!

Though IIRC it was later because didn't inauguration used to be March?
Click to expand...

Kep, you can take partial credit for this one:

For me the video after your Zing was this one. The phone rang just as it auto started. It was the "windows support" telemarketer calling. I just dialed up the speakers and laid the phone on the laptop until the fool hung up. :D
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

Kepler said:
You realize the tremendous irony of this post, right? :p
Click to expand...

The whole world is irony to me right now. Remember this?
http://board.uscho.com/showthread.p...t-s-a-Battle&p=6444302&viewfull=1#post6444302

But this is how political power and the addled partisan brain in D.C. functions. Those in power always regard leaks as a heinous crime, while those out of power regard them as a noble act. They seamlessly shift sides as their position in D.C. changes.
Click to expand...

The leak lovers are now the leak haters. And on. And on.
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

Kepler said:
What did Dunham do?

And hey, if you want your own triumverate of losers, you can have King. Chaffetz. Sessions. So what's worse, having rich supporters who are idiots, or having elected officials who are idiots?
Click to expand...

Kepler, that is stupid and ridiculous.

I mean, how can you leave Issa off of that list?!
 
Re: POTUS 45.4 - What's a Battle?

Kepler said:
What did Dunham do?

And hey, if you want your own triumverate of losers, you can have King. Chaffetz. Sessions. So what's worse, having rich supporters who are idiots, or having elected officials who are idiots?
Click to expand...

People were blaming Dunham for Clinton losing the election because she was too outspoken.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top