What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rabble rousers. If the colonies lost, the patriots would be footnotes.

The Crown would have turned off their agitation so as they could not share their opinions.

You do see that the government isn't the one shutting him down right?
Also...hate speech is what Jones traffics in...not just rabble rousing.
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

Rabble rousers. If the colonies lost, the patriots would be footnotes.

The Crown would have turned off their agitation so as they could not share their opinions.

It’s very disturbing that you can’t distinguish the difference between the two.
 
I wonder if the populace of 177x and 201x could if you interchanged them.

Supression of ideas you disagree with is not a good idea. But liberals seem comfortable with it. Shame on you.

Wow...
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

I wonder if the populace of 177x and 201x could if you interchanged them.

Supression of ideas you disagree with is not a good idea. But liberals seem comfortable with it. Shame on you.

If Alex Jones had any ideas, you might have a point. But all he has is hate speech and conspiracy theories.
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

I wonder if the populace of 177x and 201x could if you interchanged them.

Supression of ideas you disagree with is not a good idea. But liberals seem comfortable with it. Shame on you.

Unreal

You’re going off the deep end. You seriously can’t distinguish between:
—someone who says sandy hook was a false flag attack and lizard people are in cahoots with Clinton to run a pedophile ring
—A founding father once called a great orator by a future Chief Justice of the United States
 
Unreal

You’re going off the deep end. You seriously can’t distinguish between:
—someone who says sandy hook was a false flag attack and lizard people are in cahoots with Clinton to run a pedophile ring
—A founding father once called a great orator by a future Chief Justice of the United States

Why is this surprising
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

Unreal

You’re going off the deep end. You seriously can’t distinguish between:
—someone who says sandy hook was a false flag attack and lizard people are in cahoots with Clinton to run a pedophile ring
—A founding father once called a great orator by a future Chief Justice of the United States

joe is a thinker, unlike flaggy, but the confirmation bias is strong in that one too. Comparing Alex Jones to Patrick Henry is so forced, it's just plain lame.

Jones and his flaggys would love it, though.
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

I wonder if the populace of 177x and 201x could if you interchanged them.

Supression of ideas you disagree with is not a good idea. But liberals seem comfortable with it. Shame on you.

YouTube doesn't have to give someone a platform any more than you do, sparky. Your party has made a fortune protecting the 1st amendment rights of corporations. You don't get to play the martyr when Frankenstein's monster turns on itself.
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

<img src="https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/free_speech.png"></img>

This. Internet sites have terms you agree to when you sign up to post on them. This isn't a central park in public with no overseers of said park, to put in the most basic terms. There are rules you have to follow, since in essence, it's a privately owned site.
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

One wonders if Sam Adams or Patrick Henry would have had their YouTube channels shut down back in the day.

Yeah they would had to, like, pay to publish their pamphlets and distribute them themselves, rather than rely on some private company to do the actual work for them, and that would have never worked.
 
No you cumquat. Never watched or listened to it.

You might want to see some of it. I think you'll see why anyone that can think for themselves has no issue with this.

Crap. That's right. It just got a lot harder for you to see it. We're in a pickle.

Oh well moving on.
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

And Captain Obvious says:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Experts say Kris Kobach used flawed research to defend Trump’s voter fraud panel <a href="https://t.co/I4VObQCzni">https://t.co/I4VObQCzni</a></p>— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) <a href="https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1026690642318123008?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Readers React: California's on fire, and Trump's EPA wants to get rid of its climate-change fighting mileage standards. This is insane. <a href="https://t.co/Ch74B4SWnu">https://t.co/Ch74B4SWnu</a> <a href="https://t.co/DTiMC631vO">pic.twitter.com/DTiMC631vO</a></p>— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) <a href="https://twitter.com/latimes/status/1026689407632465921?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

I wonder if the populace of 177x and 201x could if you interchanged them.

Supression of ideas you disagree with is not a good idea. But liberals seem comfortable with it. Shame on you.

He's able to purchase and operate his own server and website. YouTube and company simply told him to get off their lawn, kind of like when a baker tells a gay couple to get out of their bakery. Funny how that works, isn't it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top