If you're making the assumption, then either that's not a very wise assumption to make, or that would be something to the contrary of what you're attempting to clarify. If something's going to be posted here somewhat repetitively, then I have no choice but to take it at face value.
OK, so it was Charlottesville. One group starts speaking, another group wishes to engage in political discourse. Nothing wrong with that; it's a very healthy thing. BTW, nazis aren't far right, given "socialism" (at least a translation thereof) is in the long definition of "nazi". If you're trying to disavow from that group, that's fine, but there's more than two sides to this, so lumping them in with another group you don't like isn't the wisest course. Especially since the two sides engaging in political discourse were, by your definition, "far right". Once militants started to show up in the form of Antifa, and then cars were being driven in by another group to run over people, that's when things devolved, and that is what was being condemned. What Trump's saying is that it doesn't matter who started it, they're all behaving like a bunch of buffoons, so stop it. Just like any good mediator does.
