Are we sure that’s what he’s implying? It’s still hard for me to believe that he could be that dumb.
So we're going to excuse it on double entendre grounds? Are we Sarah Huckleberry Sanders now?
Uhhhhhhhhhhh what?
Wait is this for real?
I think folks are reading too far into it, if they think that tweet is implying sex-for-money.
I think folks are reading too far into it, if they think that tweet is implying sex-for-money.
What was the sex quote?
Trump is despicable already, without reasonable people needing to become mind-reading mystics. I assumed she offered to fetch his Big Macs.That she would do anything for a contribution.
He doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt. Consider the source.:
Perfect. Just speak the truth and let his head explode.He doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt. Consider the source.
In any case, Gillibrand handled it perfectly:
"I think it's sloppy," said Richard Painter, a former White House ethics lawyer under President George W. Bush. "The conspiratorial side of me thinks somebody at Justice is not giving you the explanation for the waiver because they want to create the impression that Robert Mueller has a problem when Robert Mueller doesn't have a problem ... This is going to lead to Fox News conspiracy talk."
I think folks are reading too far into it, if they think that tweet is implying sex-for-money.
Handing Trump an out. The fix is in.
All he had to do was leave out this:
(and would do anything for them),
and he just would've just been viewed as an *****hat. Adding that in, and now he's a total misogynistic pig. It's so gross. I hope people screenshotted that tweet because I'm thinking his people will make him delete it shortly.